Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39717274›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2024

The biogeography of gastrointestinal mucosal microbiota of beef cattle at harvest.

J Daniel Young, Lee J Pinnell, Cory A Wolfe, Enrique Doster, Robert Valeris-Chacin, Ty E Lawrence, John T Richeson, Paul S Morley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Effect ofMicrobiology spectrum · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

J Daniel YoungDepartment of Agricultural Sciences, West Texas A&M University, Canyon, TX, United States.
Lee J PinnellVERO Program, Texas A&M University, Canyon, TX, United States.
Cory A WolfeVERO Program, Texas A&M University, Canyon, TX, United States.
Enrique DosterVERO Program, Texas A&M University, Canyon, TX, United States.
Robert Valeris-ChacinVERO Program, Texas A&M University, Canyon, TX, United States.
Ty E LawrenceDepartment of Agricultural Sciences, West Texas A&M University, Canyon, TX, United States.
John T RichesonDepartment of Agricultural Sciences, West Texas A&M University, Canyon, TX, United States.
Paul S MorleyVERO Program, Texas A&M University, Canyon, TX, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The gastrointestinal microbiota profoundly influences the health and productivity of animals. This study aimed to characterize microbial community structures of the mouth, gastrointestinal tract (GIT), and feces of cattle. Methods: Samples were collected from 18 Akaushi crossbred steers at harvest from multiple locations, including the oral cavity, rumen, abomasum, duodenum, jejunum, ileum, cecum, spiral colon, distal colon, and feces. These cattle were raised without exposure to antimicrobial drugs or hormone implants. Total microbial abundance was assessed using qPCR targeting the V3-V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene, and microbial community composition was evaluated through 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Results: Total microbial abundance was lesser in the small intestine than in other GIT regions ( Discussion: This study provides an in-depth evaluation of the GIT of harvest-ready Akaushi crossbred cattle of varying growth rates. Clear differences exist in the abundance and composition of microbial populations at different points of the GIT. Unfortunately, no single GIT location can adequately represent the microbial communities of the entire GIT, which has important implications for future research. Additionally, examining microbiome data only at the phylum level likely oversimplifies important complexities of the microbial community structures, and investigations of lower taxonomic ranks should be included.

Indexed as

16SfeedlotmicrobiomeqPCRsequencing

Identifiers

PMID39717274
PMCPMC11663860

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.