Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39717232›Full record

ArticleAsia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing2024

Interrelation between dyadic coping and psychological resilience among cervical cancer couples in Northwest China: An Actor-Partner interdependence model.

Tianruixue Zhang, Ping Yan, Zhisheng Huang, Li Liu, Yanhui Zhou, Yuqiao Xiao, Guiyuan Ma, Zixuan Liu, Jia Xu, Can Gu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. The interplay and influence of anxiety and depression among men with early-stage prostate cancer and their close allies.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Tianruixue ZhangDepartment of Nursing School of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, China.
Ping YanDepartment of Nursing School of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, China.
Zhisheng HuangDepartment of Clinical Research Center for Mental Disorders, Shanghai Pudong New Area Mental Health Center, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Li LiuDepartment of Xiangya School of Nursing, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Yanhui ZhouDepartment of Nursing, The First Affiliated Hospital, Hengyang Medical School, University of South, Hengyang, China.
Yuqiao XiaoDepartment of Xiangya School of Nursing, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Guiyuan MaDepartment of Xiangya School of Nursing, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Zixuan LiuDepartment of Nursing School of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, China.
Jia XuDepartment of Nursing School of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, China.
Can GuDepartment of Health Care Research Center for Xinjiang Regional Population, Urumqi, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to explore how dyadic coping (DC) influences the psychological resilience (PR) levels of patients with cervical cancer (CC) and their spouses. Methods: From April to June 2024, this cross-sectional study involved 177 dyads of patients with CC and their spouses from the gynecology and oncology wards of two tertiary hospitals in Xinjiang. Data were collected through questionnaires on demographic information, clinical characteristics, the Resilience Scale, and the Dyadic Coping Inventory, all of which were self-report measures. The results were thoroughly analyzed utilizing the Actor-Partner Interdependence Mediation Model. Results: The patients had a mean age of 49.94 ​± ​8.05 years (range: 26-64), with the majority being at stage II of CC. Their spouses had a mean age of 51.90 ​± ​8.02 years (range: 27-65). DC scores averaged 105.50 ​± ​23.98 for patients and 103.34 ​± ​22.26 for spouses, while PR scores were 63.51 ​± ​19.68 for patients and 67.44 ​± ​18.97 for spouses. Positive DC, which significantly correlated with higher levels of PR, was observed in patients with CC and their spouses ( Conclusions: Patients with CC and their spouses' PR is significantly influenced by both partners' DC behaviors. When both partners used positive coping strategies, their PR increased. Conversely, negative DC behaviors affected only patients' PR, possibly because of self-concealment and communication barriers, which may explain the lack of a reciprocal impact. Nurses should identify couples at risk for negative DC and implement resilience interventions to encourage both partners' engagement in positive coping.

Indexed as

Actor-Partner interdependence modelCervical cancerDyadic copingPsychological resilience

Identifiers

PMID39717232
PMCPMC11665680

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.