Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39717227›Full record

ArticleThe Lancet regional health. Europe2025

Physiological versus time based cord clamping in very preterm infants (ABC3): a parallel-group, multicentre, randomised, controlled superiority trial.

Ronny Knol, Emma Brouwer, Thomas van den Akker, Philip L J DeKoninck, Wes Onland, Marijn J Vermeulen, Willem P de Boode, Anton H van Kaam, Enrico Lopriore, Irwin K M Reiss and 17 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Lancet regional health. Europe, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03808051 (Physiological-based Cord Clamping in Very Preterm Infants), which is not on this map. Cited by 27 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03808051 nacompletednot on this map

Physiological-based Cord Clamping in Very Preterm Infants: a Multicentre Randomised Controlled Trial.

TypeinterventionalSponsorLeiden University Medical CenterRan2019 to 2025Enrolled689ConditionsPreterm Infant, Birth, PretermArmsPhysiological-based cord clamping, Time-based cord clamping
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Singapore Neonatal Resuscitation Guidelines 2026.Singapore medical journal · 2026
    Guideline
  2. Guideline
  3. Rates and predictors of intraventricular hemorrhage in the ventfirst trial with comparison to a contemporaneous cohort.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2026
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. [Interpretation of the "European consensus guidelines on the management of respiratory distress syndrome: 2025"].Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2026
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

27 authors.

Ronny KnolDivision of Neonatology, Department of Neonatal and Pediatric Intensive Care, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Emma BrouwerDivision of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Thomas van den AkkerDepartment of Obstetrics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Philip L J DeKoninckDivision of Obstetrics and Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Wes OnlandDepartment of Neonatology, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Marijn J VermeulenDivision of Neonatology, Department of Neonatal and Pediatric Intensive Care, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Willem P de BoodeDivision of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Amalia Children's Hospital, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Anton H van KaamDepartment of Neonatology, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Enrico LoprioreDivision of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Irwin K M ReissDivision of Neonatology, Department of Neonatal and Pediatric Intensive Care, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
G Jeroen HuttenDepartment of Neonatology, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Sandra A PrinsDepartment of Neonatology, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Estelle E M MulderDepartment of Neonatology, Isala Women and Children's Hospital, Zwolle, the Netherlands.
Esther J d'HaensDepartment of Neonatology, Isala Women and Children's Hospital, Zwolle, the Netherlands.
Christian V HulzebosDepartment of Pediatrics, Beatrix Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Helene A BoumaDepartment of Pediatrics, Beatrix Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Sam J van SambeeckDepartment of Pediatrics, Maxima Medical Center, Veldhoven, the Netherlands.
Hendrik J NiemarktDepartment of Pediatrics, Maxima Medical Center, Veldhoven, the Netherlands.
Mayke E van der PuttenDepartment of Pediatrics, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Tinta LebonDepartment of Pediatrics, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Inge A ZonnenbergDepartment of Neonatology, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Debbie H NuytemansDepartment of Neonatology, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Sten P WillemsenDepartment of Biostatistics, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Graeme R PolglaseThe Ritchie Centre, Hudson Institute of Medical Research, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
Sylke J SteggerdaDivision of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Stuart B HooperThe Ritchie Centre, Hudson Institute of Medical Research, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
Arjan B Te PasDivision of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Physiological-based cord clamping (PBCC) in preterm infants is beneficial for cardiovascular transition at birth and may optimize placental transfusion. Whether PBCC can improve clinical outcomes is unknown. The aim of the Aeration, Breathing, Clamping (ABC3) trial was to test whether PBCC results in improved intact survival in very preterm infants. Methods: The ABC3 trial was a parallel-group, multicentre, randomised, controlled superiority clinical trial conducted in all Dutch tertiary referral centers for perinatal care involving infants born before 30 weeks of gestation. Infants were randomised to either PBCC or time-based delayed cord clamping (TBCC), stratified by gestational age and treatment center. Infants receiving PBCC were stabilised with umbilical cord intact, which was clamped after reaching cardiorespiratory stability (heart rate >100 bpm and SpO2 >85% while supplemental oxygen <40%). In TBCC the cord was clamped after 30-60 s. The primary outcome was survival without major cerebral injury and/or necrotizing enterocolitis. The primary and key secondary analyses were done in both the intention-to-treat and per-protocol populations. The trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03808051). Findings: From January 25, 2019, through October 2, 2022, 669 infants were randomised (median gestational age 27 Interpretation: PBCC in very preterm infants did not increase survival without major cerebral injury or necrotizing enterocolitis compared to TBCC in the entire cohort. A possible beneficial effect in male infants requires confirmation from other trials. PBCC was safe to perform and parents reported more contentment and less anxiety. Funding: The Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development.

Indexed as

Cord clampingNewborn resuscitationPreterm infants

Identifiers

PMID39717227
PMCPMC11664066

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.