Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39717223›Full record

ArticleAdvances in medical education and practice2024

Perception of Telemedicine and Remote Learning Following the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Health Education England Survey of London Obstetrics and Gynaecology Trainees.

Sughashini Murugesu, Robert James Grogan, Hannah Meehan, Nina Cooper, Alex Novak, Erna Bayar, Lorraine Sheena Kasaven, Shankar Dilip Visvanathan, Srdjan Saso, Karen Joash and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in medical education and practice, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Sughashini MurugesuQueen Charlotte's and Chelsea Hospital, Imperial College, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8852-0892
Robert James GroganQueen Charlotte's and Chelsea Hospital, Imperial College, London, UK.
Hannah MeehanQueen Charlotte's and Chelsea Hospital, Imperial College, London, UK.
Nina CooperQueen Charlotte's and Chelsea Hospital, Imperial College, London, UK.
Alex NovakQueen Charlotte's and Chelsea Hospital, Imperial College, London, UK.
Erna BayarQueen Charlotte's and Chelsea Hospital, Imperial College, London, UK.
Lorraine Sheena KasavenQueen Charlotte's and Chelsea Hospital, Imperial College, London, UK.
Shankar Dilip VisvanathanLondon School of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Health Education England, London, UK.
Srdjan SasoQueen Charlotte's and Chelsea Hospital, Imperial College, London, UK.
Karen JoashQueen Charlotte's and Chelsea Hospital, Imperial College, London, UK.
Tom BourneQueen Charlotte's and Chelsea Hospital, Imperial College, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To determine the level of uptake of telemedicine among postgraduate obstetrics and gynaecology (O&G) trainees in London, and how they perceive its impact on their training. Methods: A mixed-methods survey aimed at exploring trainee perspectives of telemedicine use in clinical practice and its implications for training. Study participants were O&G specialist doctors on the London (UK) training programme. The survey was distributed to the 2022 cohort via Email communication facilitated by Health Education England. Results: The response rate was 46.3% (118/255). Of respondents, 96% (113/118) had experience of telemedicine, in a range of clinical environments; 91% (106/117) felt telemedicine should become embedded in O&G practice (the most frequent reported advantage was time-saving and a barrier was language translation); 43% of trainees (50/116) stated that they were unable to attain effective clinical training during telemedicine appointments; and 70% (81/116) indicated a preference for remote online teaching. The majority of trainees (75%) had some level of experience in the use of technology in clinical training, encompassing various modalities including surgical and ultrasound simulation, remote real-time training and virtual reality patient consultations. Trainee responses, on the whole, reflected a lack of confidence in their ultrasound skills; 79.5% (74/93) of trainees responsible for acute gynaecology admissions reported that at least 25% of admissions were for deferred ultrasound scanning investigation. Most trainees anticipated that real-time remote supervision for both USS and laparoscopy would enhance training opportunities and expedite time to patient diagnosis and management. Anticipated barriers included concerns regarding the uptake of technology and connectivity issues. Conclusion: Telemedicine for clinical care has been demonstrated to be well-received by most O&G trainees. However, it is necessary to consider effective O&G training when delivering telemedicine. Technology gives rise to a number of training opportunities, with the development of online teaching, telementoring and simulation. Trainees report both advantages and disadvantages which should be carefully considered to optimise postgraduate O&G training.

Indexed as

obstetrics and gynaecologypostgraduate trainingtelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID39717223
PMCPMC11664110

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.