ArticlePhysics and imaging in radiation oncology2024
Feasibility and potential clinical benefit of dose de-escalation in stereotactic ablative radiotherapy for lung cancer lesions with ground glass opacities.
Article in Physics and imaging in radiation oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Treatment of neoplasic lung nodules with ground glass opacities (GGO) faces two primary challenges. First, the standard practice of treating GGOs as solid nodules, which effectively controls the tumor locally, but might increase associated toxicities. The second is the potential for dose calculation errors related to increased heterogeneity. This study addresses the optimization of a dose de-escalation regime for stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) for GGO lesions. Materials and Methods: We used the CT scans of 35 patients (40 lesions) with some degree of GGO component treated at our institution between 2017 and 2021. We first assessed the dose calculation accuracy as a function of the GGO component of the lesion. We then analysed the advantages of a dose de-escalation regime in terms of lung dose reduction (Dmean, V20Gy and V300GyBED3) and plan robustness. Results: We found a positive correlation between the presence of GGO and the dose calculation errors in a phantom scenario. These differences are reduced for patient data and in the presence of breathing motion. When using a de-escalation regime, significant reductions were achieved in mean lung dose, V20Gy and V300GyBED3. This study also revealed that lower doses in GGO areas lead to more stable fluence patterns, increasing treatment robustness. Conclusions: The study lays the foundation for an eventual use of dose de-escalation in SABR for treating lung lesions with GGO, potentially leading to equivalent local control while reducing associated toxicities. These findings lay the groundwork for future clinical trials.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.