Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39717180›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2024

Conjunctival ultraviolet autofluorescence as a biomarker of outdoor time in myopic children.

Miriam de la Puente, Valentina Bilbao-Malavé, Jorge González-Zamora, Aura Ortega Claici, Jaione Bezunartea, Leire Gomez-Arteta, Elena Alonso, María Hernández, Patricia Fernández-Robredo, Manuel Sáenz de Viteri and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Conjunctival Ultraviolet Autofluorescence: A Systematic Review of Factors Affecting Observed Ocular Damage.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Miriam de la PuenteDepartment of Ophthalmology, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
Valentina Bilbao-MalavéRetinal Pathologies and New Therapies Group, Experimental Ophthalmology Laboratory, Department of Ophthalmology, Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
Jorge González-ZamoraDepartment of Ophthalmology, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
Aura Ortega ClaiciRetinal Pathologies and New Therapies Group, Experimental Ophthalmology Laboratory, Department of Ophthalmology, Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
Jaione BezunarteaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
Leire Gomez-ArtetaFaculty of Medicine, Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
Elena AlonsoDepartment of Ophthalmology, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
María HernándezDepartment of Ophthalmology, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
Patricia Fernández-RobredoDepartment of Ophthalmology, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
Manuel Sáenz de ViteriDepartment of Ophthalmology, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
Nerea Martín CalvoNavarra Institute for Health Research, IdiSNA, Pamplona, Spain.
Alfredo García-LayanaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
Jesús Barrio-BarrioDepartment of Ophthalmology, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
Sergio RecaldeDepartment of Ophthalmology, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The prevalence of myopia has increased significantly in recent years including an earlier onset of myopia development on the pediatric population. The main objective of the study is to compare CUVAF (Conjunctival Ultraviolet Autofluorescence) in children with and without myopia to validate its usefulness as an outdoor protective biomarker. Methods: A case-control observational study was conducted in a child cohort from subjects that attended to the Ophthalmology Department of Clínica Universidad de Navarra for an ophthalmological examination. The general exclusion criteria were (among others): amblyopia, congenital myopia, general ophthalmic disease, and any conjunctival alteration that might difficult the measurement of the CUVAF area. All participants underwent an automatic objective refraction under cycloplegic effect, biometry to measure axial length (AL) and central corneal radius (CCR), and completed a questionnaire about their lifestyle habits. A total of 4 images of the bulbar conjunctiva were taken with blue light in order to quantify the CUVAF area. Results: A total of 263 subjects (6 to 17 years old) were analyzed with no significant differences in demographic data between case group and control group. There were 50 non-myopic subjects (19%) and 213 myopic subjects (81%). In relation to the outdoor activities (OA), myopic subjects spent significantly fewer hours per week outdoors than the control-group ( Conclusion: CUVAF is a useful biomarker for OA and it has an inverse relationship with myopia degree also in pediatric age, especially after the age of 12, so it could be useful to differentiate the risk of developing myopia. Having a CUVAF area greater than that corresponding to age, protect to myopia 2.5 times, being almost 5 times the protection in case of high myopia.

Indexed as

biomarkerCUVAFlight exposuremyopiaoutdoor activities for children

Identifiers

PMID39717180
PMCPMC11663684

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.