Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39717129›Full record

ArticleData in brief2024

Dataset of cone opponent mechanisms and spectral tuning in non-primate vertebrates.

Carlay L Teed, Samuel Hartzler, Esteban Fernández-Juricic

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Data in brief, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Carlay L TeedPurdue University, 610 Purdue Mall, West Lafayette, IN 47907, United States.
Samuel HartzlerPurdue University, 610 Purdue Mall, West Lafayette, IN 47907, United States.
Esteban Fernández-JuricicPurdue University, 610 Purdue Mall, West Lafayette, IN 47907, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cone and spectral opponency are fundamental to colour processing in many species and are well studied in primates. The data required to make interspecific comparisons of the neural mechanisms associated with colour processing is spread across a broad body of literature reaching back to the 1950's across four retinal cell types and multiple brain regions. We aimed to produce a comprehensive dataset of all known cone opponent cells in non-primate vertebrates in image forming visual pathways. We completed a systematic literature search of two databases, Web of Science and Scopus, following PRISMA guidelines. From the data collected, we produced three datasets. One dataset contains cone opponency data that indicates which photoreceptors drive cell light responses. The second dataset contains spectral opponency data that represents the cell electrical responses to different wavelengths of light. Additionally, we developed a third database of photoreceptor data for the species for which cone or spectral opponency was reported to supplement the first two. These datasets will provide a synthesis of the data in the field of colour processing, can be used for interspecific and intraspecific meta-analyses, and can provide a starting point for understanding neural mechanisms behind wavelength comparisons in non-primate vertebrates.

Indexed as

Colour visionComparative physiologyPhotoreceptorRetinal mechanisms

Identifiers

PMID39717129
PMCPMC11664137

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.