ArticleMethodsX2024
A field-friendly alternative to freeze-drying faeces for glucocorticoid metabolite quantification in animals of different feeding classes.
Article in MethodsX, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effects of heat-assisted sample desiccation on microbiome surveys.Environmental microbiome · 2026Article
- Non-invasive biomarkers of reproduction in individuals and populations of wild vertebrates.The Journal of reproduction and development · 2026Review
- Comparison of methods for faecal hormone preservation and analysis in African savanna elephants under field conditions.Conservation physiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Monitoring stress-related faecal glucocorticoid metabolite (fGCM) concentrations is a reliable, popular and established approach for understanding wildlife responses to perceived stressors. To maintain fGCM integrity post-defaecation, faecal material must be promptly stored frozen, or dried to prevent continued suspected bacterial enzyme activity. We compare the effectiveness of freeze-drying with other field-friendly drying techniques (food dehydrator and homemade solar oven). We collected 10 fresh faecal samples each from nine species (giraffe, impala, blue wildebeest, plains zebra, African elephant, white rhino, cheetah, spotted hyena, and leopard) and monitored alterations in fGCM concentrations over time utilizing these different drying techniques. Our findings indicate that a homemade solar oven is as effective as freeze-drying faecal samples. A food dehydrator is also a suitable method for drying faecal samples for the carnivores monitored. Our findings provide field-friendly methods for researchers dealing with logistical constraints in remote field sites.•For all species examined, a homemade solar oven offers a practical and affordable alternative to freeze-drying faeces for fGCM quantification.•A food dehydrator provides an affordable alternative to freeze-drying faeces for fGCM analysis when monitoring carnivores.•Different faecal sample drying techniques should not be utilized within a single study to ensure comparable analyses of fGCM values.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.