ArticleInfection and drug resistance2024
Clinical Application of Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing (mNGS) in Patients with Early Pulmonary Infection After Liver Transplantation.
Article in Infection and drug resistance, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Predictive Value of Nomogram Model Based on Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR) and Prothrombin Time-International Normalized Ratio (PT-INR)-to-Albumin Ratio (PTAR) for Early Bacterial Intra-Abdominal Infection After Orthotopic Liver Transplantation.Journal of inflammation research · 2026Article
- Interpretable machine learning models for pre- and postoperative prediction of early intra-abdominal infections after liver transplantation: a multicenter retrospective cohort study.Therapeutic advances in infectious diseaseArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To examine the clinical utility of metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) in individuals with early pulmonary infection following liver transplantation. Patients and Methods: mNGS and traditional detection results were retrospectively collected from 99 patients with pulmonary infection within one week following liver transplantation. These patients were admitted to the Department of Critical Liver Diseases at Beijing Friendship Hospital from February 2022 to February 2024, along with their general clinical data. Results: mNGS exhibited a significantly higher detection rate than traditional methods (92.93% vs 54.55%, P < 0.05) and was more effective in identifying mixed infections (67.68% vs 14.81%, P < 0.05). mNGS identified 303 pathogens in 92 patients, with Conclusion: mNGS offers rapid detection, a high positivity rate, insensitivity to antibiotics, and a superior ability to detect mixed infections in patients with early post-transplant pulmonary infections. Additionally, mNGS shows good consistency with traditional culture and can predict drug-resistant phenotypes to guide targeted antibiotic therapy for early-stage post-transplant pulmonary infection after liver transplantation. Patients whose antibiotic therapy is based on mNGS results have experienced decreased mortality rates and overall improved prognosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.