ArticleFrontiers in public health2024
Impact of accelerated review policy on portfolio planning of vaccine companies.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: With the introduction of the accelerated drug review policy in China, the clinical research and development time and the review and approval time of drugs have been shortened accordingly. Especially under the influence of the COVID-19 pandemic, the vaccine formulations released through the accelerated review policy are springing up, and the question of how the accelerated review policy affects the investment portfolio of vaccine enterprises has also attracted more and more attention. Aims and methods: The article uses mixed-integer linear programming to develop a new model on portfolio planning for vaccine companies based on the accelerated review policy context. The model is constructed using the Gurobi extension class of .NET, and the investment decision is made and simulated by the Gurobi solver to investigate the portfolio planning decision of a vaccine company maximizing the net present value of its vaccine production portfolio with the increase of available capital over a 20-year time horizon. Results: The NPV under the accelerated review policy is significantly higher than the net present value under the standard review policy when the available capital exceeds RMB 900 million. And the difference between the two of them peaks at RMB 1.87 billion when the available capital is RMB 1.9 billion; break-even occurs about 1.3 years earlier in the accelerated review policy than in the standard review; and when the available capital is the same, firms in the accelerated review policy choose to produce four products earlier and make the decision to invest in facility construction earlier; scenarios in the accelerated review policy are not as sensitive to changes in model parameters as they are in the standard review. Conclusion: The accelerated review policy is effective in providing incentives for commercialisation. The results of this study will provide an effective reference for vaccine companies to make scientific portfolio planning under the accelerated review policy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.