ArticleJournal of environmental quality
PFAS in agroecosystems: Sources, impacts, and opportunities for mitigating risks to human and ecosystem health.
Article in Journal of environmental quality. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Hidden Costs of Soil Degradation: Threats to Global Food Security and Planetary Health.ACS environmental Au · 2026Review
- PFAS in Peri-Urban Agricultural Water: Assessing the Hazard Index in an Organic Farming Environment in Maryland, USA.Toxics · 2026Article
- PFAS in agroecosystems: Sources, impacts, and opportunities for mitigating risks to human and ecosystem health.Journal of environmental qualityArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Concerns regarding per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) and their precursors have driven increased research into their sources, impacts, and mitigation strategies, aiming to reduce their prevalence in the environment. While much of this research has centered on known large sources of PFAS (e.g., military bases, airports, fire training sites, and some manufacturing facilities), there has been increased interest in evaluating the inadvertent introduction of PFAS into agroecosystems from beneficial reuse of treated domestic wastewater for irrigation and land application of biosolids and composts derived from food waste. Additional sources to agricultural fields include the use of PFAS-containing pesticides. These activities raise questions regarding the potential impacts of PFAS introduced to agricultural systems on rural water supplies, soil health, and food safety. This special section contains papers that fall into three categories: (i) source assessment of PFAS in water and wastewater residuals destined for beneficial reuse in agroecosystems, (ii) improved understanding of PFAS fate and transport in agroecosystems following land application of PFAS-containing materials, and (iii) small-scale assessment of techniques that demonstrate promise for mitigating PFAS mobilization in agroecosystems. The work contained in this special section can be used to help guide future decisions related to PFAS guidelines, policies, and regulations in agroecosystems intended to protect human and ecological health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.