ArticleHaemophilia : the official journal of the World Federation of Hemophilia2025
Cross-Cultural Translation of the Adolescent Menstrual Bleeding Questionnaire (AMBQ).
Article in Haemophilia : the official journal of the World Federation of Hemophilia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Cross-Cultural adaptation and validation of adolescent menstrual bleeding questionnaire in a Turkish sample.BMC women's health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimHeavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) affects up to 37% of adolescents. Given the paucity of available tools to assess health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in adolescents with HMB, we developed the adolescent menstrual bleeding questionnaire (aMBQ), a valid and reliable measure of bleeding-related quality of life. The aim of this study was cross-cultural translation and adaptation of the English aMBQ into French to ensure accessibility for more Canadian adolescents who menstruate.
methodsA five-step process was followed: (1) forward translation from English to Canadian French; (2) backward translation from French to English; (3) review of source and translated aMBQ to create a reconciled version; (4) cognitive debriefing to ensure linguistic and clinical equivalence and (5) review of cognitive debriefings to produce the final version of the French aMBQ. Results of cognitive debriefings were reviewed after every three participants; items were revised if presented as an issue by ≥2 participants. These changes were implemented and tested in cognitive debriefings until saturation was reached.
resultsLinguistic changes were made to nine (33%) of the questions and one (3.7%) answer options. Major changes were made to four of the 27 questions (15%), and minor changes were made to five of the 27 questions (19%).
conclusionProfessional translators, clinical experts and patient input through cognitive debriefing are pivotal to successful cross-cultural translation. Results of cognitive debriefing interviews suggest the French aMBQ is easily understood and confirms its face validity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.