SynthesisClinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis
Optimal Antithrombotic Regimen After Cryptogenic Stroke: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.
Synthesis in Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Wearable Technology and Its Potential Role in Cardiovascular Health Monitoring and Disease Management.Health science reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although several antithrombotic strategies have been investigated for the management of cryptogenic strokes, ie, ischemic strokes without known etiologies, an optimal antithrombotic strategy for cryptogenic strokes is unknown. We aim to assess oral antithrombotic agents' comparative efficacy and safety after cryptogenic stroke to identify an optimal treatment.A systematic review and meta-analysis synthesizing evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) obtained from PubMed, Embase Cochrane, Scopus, and Web of Science until February 2024. We used the random-effects model to report dichotomous outcomes using a risk ratio (RR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI). Frequentist network meta-analysis was conducted using R, version 4.3.1.Seven RCTs with 15,240 patients were included. None of the OACs showed a significant efficacy in preventing all-cause mortality, stroke recurrence, cardiovascular mortality, and major adverse cardiac events compared to aspirin. Also, safety measures were similar between different OACs and aspirin regarding safety measures, including major bleeding, intracranial hemorrhage, and gastrointestinal bleeding. However, only rivaroxaban significantly increased the incidence of major bleeding (RR: 2.69, CI [1.67, 4.33]).There was no difference between various OACs and aspirin regarding efficacy and safety outcomes. There is a greater risk of major bleeding with rivaroxaban. Further research is still warranted to define a personalized strategy for selecting antithrombotic strategies after cryptogenic stroke on a case-by-case basis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.