Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39716780›Full record

ReviewThe New phytologist2025

Tiny but mighty? Overview of a decade of research on nectar bacteria.

Sergio Quevedo-Caraballo, Clara de Vega, Bart Lievens, Tadashi Fukami, Sergio Álvarez-Pérez

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The New phytologist, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sergio Quevedo-CaraballoDepartment of Animal Health, Complutense University of Madrid, 28040, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-0698-6299
Clara de VegaDepartamento de Biología Vegetal y Ecología, Universidad de Sevilla, 41012, Sevilla, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-4553-798X
Bart LievensLaboratory for Process Microbial Ecology and Bioinspirational Management (PME&BIM), Department of Microbial and Molecular Systems, KU Leuven, B-3001, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-7698-6641
Tadashi FukamiDepartment of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305-5020, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5654-4785
Sergio Álvarez-PérezDepartment of Animal Health, Complutense University of Madrid, 28040, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-6587-8995

Funding

Agentschap Innoveren en OndernemenComplutense University of Madrid, SpainConsejería de Educación, Ciencia y Universidades, Comunidad de Madrid PIPF-2023/ECO-29442Directorate for Biological Sciences DEB 1737758ESF Investing in your futureFonds Wetenschappelijk OnderzoekKU LeuvenMinisterio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades CNS2022-135237Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades PID2022-136719NB-I00Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades RYC2018-023847-I
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An emerging focus of research at the intersection of botany, zoology, and microbiology is the study of floral nectar as a microbial habitat, referred to as the nectar microbiome, which can alter plant-pollinator interactions. Studies on these microbial communities have primarily focused on yeasts, and it was only about a decade ago that bacteria began to be studied as widespread inhabitants of floral nectar. This review aims to give an overview of the current knowledge on nectar bacteria, with emphasis on evolutionary origin, dispersal mode, effects on nectar chemistry and plant-animal interactions, community assembly, agricultural applications, and their use as model systems in ecological research. We further outline gaps in our understanding of the ecological significance of these microorganisms, their response to environmental changes, and the potential cascading effects.

Indexed as

BacteriaPlant NectarResearchAnimalsFlowersMicrobiotaPlant Nectarbacteriafloral nectarplant–microbe–animal interactionpollinationyeast

Identifiers

PMID39716780
PMCPMC11798911

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.