Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39716774›Full record

ArticleTropical medicine & international health : TM & IH2025

Retrospective clinical performance evaluation of the Abbott Bioline HAT 2.0, a rapid diagnostic test for human African trypanosomiasis based on recombinant antigens.

Sara Tablado Alonso, Sylvain Biéler, Raquel Inocêncio da Luz, Paul Verlé, Philippe Büscher, Epco Hasker

Abstract readEvaluation StudyComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Tropical medicine & international health : TM & IH, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sara Tablado AlonsoDepartment of Public Health, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8791-7812
Sylvain BiélerNeglected Tropical Diseases Program, Foundation for Innovative New Diagnostics, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6994-9853
Raquel Inocêncio da LuzDepartment of Public Health, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2870-0311
Paul VerléDepartment of Public Health, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7252-5872
Philippe BüscherDepartment of Public Health, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1926-7472
Epco HaskerDepartment of Public Health, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3154-0419

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRapid diagnostic tests for the serological detection of gambiense human African trypanosomiasis (gHAT) have been developed to overcome the limitations of the traditional screening method, CATT/T. b. gambiense. The Abbott Bioline human African trypanosomiasis (HAT) 2.0 rapid diagnostic test has recently been developed by Abbott using only recombinant antigens. The objective of this study was to evaluate its clinical sensitivity and specificity, in comparison with the other available rapid diagnostic tests and CATT. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL

findingsFor this study, archived plasma samples from 150 gHAT cases and 150 endemic controls originating from Chad, Guinea, the Democratic Republic of the Congo and Uganda were analysed on the following tests: CATT/T. b. gambiense, the HAT Sero K-SeT, SD BIOLINE HAT and Abbott Bioline HAT 2.0 rapid diagnostic tests, and the immune trypanolysis test. The sensitivity and specificity of Abbott Bioline HAT 2.0 were 96.7% and 78.4%, respectively, and the sensitivity and specificity of SD BIOLINE HAT were 99.3% and 74.1%. The sensitivity and specificity of CATT were 98.7% and 89.2%. The sensitivity and specificity of HAT Sero K-SeT were 99.3% and 81.3%. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: The sensitivity and specificity of the Abbott Bioline HAT 2.0 are comparable to those of its predecessors HAT Sero K-SeT and SD BIOLINE HAT. However, considering the decreasing prevalence of gHAT, a higher specificity of the tests used for screening is desirable to improve their positive predictive value.

Indexed as

Antigens, ProtozoanReagent Kits, DiagnosticTrypanosoma brucei gambienseTrypanosomiasis, AfricanDemocratic Republic of the CongoFemaleHumansMaleRapid Diagnostic TestsRecombinant ProteinsRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityAntigens, ProtozoanReagent Kits, DiagnosticRecombinant Proteinshuman African trypanosomiasisrapid diagnostic testsrecombinant rapid diagnostic testsserologysleeping sicknessspecificityTrypanosoma brucei gambiense

Identifiers

PMID39716774
PMCPMC11791878

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.