ArticleTropical medicine & international health : TM & IH2025
Retrospective clinical performance evaluation of the Abbott Bioline HAT 2.0, a rapid diagnostic test for human African trypanosomiasis based on recombinant antigens.
Article in Tropical medicine & international health : TM & IH, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- The major diagnostic VSG LiTat 1.3 of the human parasite Trypanosoma brucei gambiense is a trimer in solution.PLoS pathogens · 2026Article
- Sensitivity and specificity of HAT Bioline AbbottParasites & vectors · 2026Article
- Prospective evaluation of 2nd generation rapid diagnostic tests for the serological diagnosis of gambiense human African trypanosomiasis in the Democratic Republic of the Congo.BMC infectious diseases · 2025Observational
- Global Epidemiology of Vector-Borne Parasitic Diseases: Burden, Trends, Disparities, and Forecasts (1990-2036).Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Retrospective clinical performance evaluation of the Abbott Bioline HAT 2.0, a rapid diagnostic test for human African trypanosomiasis based on recombinant antigens.Tropical medicine & international health : TM & IH · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRapid diagnostic tests for the serological detection of gambiense human African trypanosomiasis (gHAT) have been developed to overcome the limitations of the traditional screening method, CATT/T. b. gambiense. The Abbott Bioline human African trypanosomiasis (HAT) 2.0 rapid diagnostic test has recently been developed by Abbott using only recombinant antigens. The objective of this study was to evaluate its clinical sensitivity and specificity, in comparison with the other available rapid diagnostic tests and CATT. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL
findingsFor this study, archived plasma samples from 150 gHAT cases and 150 endemic controls originating from Chad, Guinea, the Democratic Republic of the Congo and Uganda were analysed on the following tests: CATT/T. b. gambiense, the HAT Sero K-SeT, SD BIOLINE HAT and Abbott Bioline HAT 2.0 rapid diagnostic tests, and the immune trypanolysis test. The sensitivity and specificity of Abbott Bioline HAT 2.0 were 96.7% and 78.4%, respectively, and the sensitivity and specificity of SD BIOLINE HAT were 99.3% and 74.1%. The sensitivity and specificity of CATT were 98.7% and 89.2%. The sensitivity and specificity of HAT Sero K-SeT were 99.3% and 81.3%. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: The sensitivity and specificity of the Abbott Bioline HAT 2.0 are comparable to those of its predecessors HAT Sero K-SeT and SD BIOLINE HAT. However, considering the decreasing prevalence of gHAT, a higher specificity of the tests used for screening is desirable to improve their positive predictive value.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.