Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39716546›Full record

ReviewAmerican journal of ophthalmology2025

Suprachoroidal Delivery of Viral and Nonviral Vectors for Treatment of Retinal and Choroidal Vascular Diseases.

Yeongseo Lim, Peter A Campochiaro, Jordan J Green

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in American journal of ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yeongseo LimFrom the Department of Biomedical Engineering (Y.L., J.J.G.), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA; Translational Tissue Engineering Center (Y.L., J.J.G.), Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA; Johns Hopkins Translational ImmunoEngineering Center (Y.L., J.J.G.), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Peter A CampochiaroDepartment of Ophthalmology (P.A.C., J.J.G.), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA; Department of Neuroscience (P.A.C.), Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA. Electronic address: pcampo@jhmi.edu.
Jordan J GreenFrom the Department of Biomedical Engineering (Y.L., J.J.G.), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA; Translational Tissue Engineering Center (Y.L., J.J.G.), Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA; Johns Hopkins Translational ImmunoEngineering Center (Y.L., J.J.G.), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA; Department of Ophthalmology (P.A.C., J.J.G.), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA; Departments of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering and Materials Science & Engineering (J.J.G.), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA; Departments of Neurosurgery and Oncology (J.J.G.), Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA; Institute for Nanobiotechnology, Johns Hopkins University (J.J.G.), Baltimore, Maryland, USA.. Electronic address: green@jhu.edu.

Funding

TR&D Project 3P41EB028239 · NIBIB · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Jordan Green, JONATHAN P SCHNECK · 2019 to 2026
$11.5M
Suprachoroidal nonviral gene transfer of engineered VEGF antagonistsR01EY031097 · NEI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI CAMPOCHIARO, PETER A, GREEN, JORDAN · 2020 to 2023
$2.4M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY031097NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB028239
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeCurrent treatments for retinal and choroidal neovascular diseases suffer from insufficient durability, including anti-vascular endothelial growth factor-A agents. It is, therefore, of interest to explore alternative methods that could allow for robust improvement in visual acuity with fewer injections required.

designLiterature review.

resultsAmong various preclinical and clinical studies in the literature, a promising approach is the use of suprachoroidal injection with viral and nonviral gene delivery vectors. Compared with other ocular injection methods, suprachoroidal injection has demonstrated wide biodistribution of injected agents and safety as an outpatient procedure. In terms of viral vectors, suprachoroidal injection of an adeno-associated virus 8 vector expressing an anti-vascular endothelial growth factor-A antibody fragment has shown an excellent safety profile and evidence of biological activity. In terms of nonviral vectors, lipid nanoparticles and polymeric nanoparticles both demonstrate strong promise for ocular gene therapy in large animal models. In particular, biodegradable poly(β-amino ester) nanoparticles show excellent biodistribution, safety, and efficacy for gene therapy via the suprachoroidal route. Nonviral nanoparticle approaches can have notable advantages over viral vectors in terms of carrying capacity, redosability, and manufacturing costs. An advantage of gene therapy is that once a delivery vector has been optimized, genetic cargos can be readily tailored without changing the safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetic properties of the delivery vector.

conclusionsThis review highlights recent progress that has been made and compares viral and nonviral suprachoroidal gene delivery for the treatment of retinal and choroidal vascular diseases. Suprachoroidal gene therapy is an emerging biotechnology that holds substantial potential to make a translational impact in treating these diseases.

Indexed as

ChoroidChoroidal NeovascularizationGenetic TherapyGenetic VectorsGene Transfer TechniquesRetinal DiseasesAnimalsDependovirusHumansNanoparticles

Identifiers

PMID39716546
PMCPMC12365889

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.