ArticleBMC health services research2024
The other health care system in Germany: care for people without health insurance.
Article in BMC health services research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundA large number of people in Germany have no health insurance. Their access to the official healthcare system is significantly more difficult or impossible. Charitable institutions try to provide medical care and create parallel healthcare structures. Their possibilities and limits are still unknown.
methodsThis study identified 128 institutions for people without health insurance. A data query was used to determine the status of medical care for uninsured patients.
resultsSixty-eight of 128 identified institutions participated in the study. They provided care to 26,300 people, required €7,580,449 for their work, ran doctor's offices (57%), provided mobile care (7.8%), and arranged only medical care (29.6%). Patients of all ages need general, internal and gynecological care. The availability of health care is heterogeneous, and health care is not available throughout the country, especially not for people with limited personal mobility. The most frequent specialties were general medicine, internal medicine, gynecology, psychiatry, and surgery. Even complex care, such as pregnancy, was possible. In a self-assessment using a Likert scale, the median of the subjectively perceived level of care measured against a regular doctor's office for insured patients was 6 of 10. The provision of medicines, medical supplies or specialized medical services depended on private donations and thus on the economic situation in Germany. Participants often used multiple solutions in parallel to conserve available resources. Institutions showed a high level of responsibility to their patients. They were mostly professionally organized, with few full-time staff and many volunteers.
conclusionMedical care for people without health insurance was heterogeneous and not universally available. Comprehensive legislative changes are needed to provide universal basic health care. The establishment of clearing houses and changes in pharmaceutical and tax law could stabilize care for people without health insurance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.