ArticleBMC health services research2024
Social interaction of people living with dementia in residential long-term care: an ecological momentary assessment study.
Article in BMC health services research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Defining and Measuring Cognitive Decline and Clinical Relevance.Neurology and therapy · 2026Review
- [Health status of older people in long-term inpatient care-a narrative review].Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2026Review
- Older Persons' Participation in Life-Enhancement Activities in a Long-Term Care Facility: A Mixed-Methods Observational Study.Journal of advanced nursing · 2026Observational
- Dietary Whole Wheat Flour Intake in Pakistan: A Cross-Sectional Insight into Long-Term Dementia Prevention.Nutrients · 2026Article
- Caring over computing: an ethical and sociotechnical perspective on digital technologies for social connectedness in dementia care.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- Matters of the Heart: Co-Creating a Peer-Led Social Health Intervention for People Living with Dementia.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Everyday life and boredom of people living with dementia in residential long-term care: a merged methods study.BMC geriatrics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe importance of social health is increasingly recognized in dementia research. For most people living with dementia, their social environment changes as the disease progresses, especially when they move into a long-term care facility. However, maintaining social interactions in the new living environment contributes significantly to health and quality of life. Staff and other residents are the most readily available interaction partners to provide this. The aim of this study is to investigate the frequency, contexts, partners and influencing factors (personal and contextual) of social interactions of people living with dementia in residential long-term care.
methodsParticipants were observed for two days in 20-min slots (from 7 am to 7 pm) in 12 long-term care facilities in Germany. The Maastricht Electronic Daily Live Observation Tool (MEDLO-tool) was used for ecological momentary assessment. Age, gender, functional status, cognitive status and length of stay at the facility were recorded. Generalized linear mixed-effect models were used for the data analysis.
resultsIn all, 106 people living with dementia (average age: 85.16 ± 7.42 years, 82.9% female) were observed at 6134 time points. No social interaction take place in 71.9% of the observations. The place where the participants spend their time influences the occurrence of social interaction (p < 0.001), with a significantly higher probability of social interaction in communal spaces. Most frequently, interaction takes place with staff (43.4%), closely followed by other residents (40.9%), with the context (location, p < 0.001; time of day, p < 0.001) and functional status (care level, p < 0.001) influencing which of the two groups people living with dementia interact with.
conclusionA better understanding of the context of social interactions and its influencing factors provide a basis for more targeted interventions. As the increasing staff shortage will further limit the opportunities for social interaction with staff, future concepts should focus on other residents. Meaningful activities that enable people living with dementia to co-operate and share responsibility can provide a stimulating framework for this. In addition, social assistance robots and the application of peer-mentoring/leading represent promising approaches for creating a socially interactive environment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.