ArticleArchives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique2024
Establishing a unified global framework for studying dementia knowledge: insights from a narrative review.
Article in Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWith the global population aging rapidly, dementia has become a pressing public health challenge, affecting the cognitive functions and daily activities of older adults worldwide. Enhancing literacy about dementia is a proactive prevention strategy, yet the effectiveness of educational programs can vary based on the target population's background. Thus, understanding dementia knowledge levels across different communities and countries is essential for successful educational interventions. Despite the large аmount of studies, there is no common framework for studying dementia knowledge, leading to significant variability in methods and poor data comparability.
methodsA narrative review is conducted to examine the methodological variability in studies of dementia knowledge and to propose a unified framework for future investigations. We hypothesize that significant differences will be evident in the methodologies employed, particularly regarding knowledge domains, research designs, influencing factors, and assessments of attitudes toward dementia.
resultsA total of 59 research publications published after 2000 were selected, revealing significant variability in approaches to studying dementia knowledge and confirming our hypothesis. We identified eight dementia knowledge domains and various sociodemographic and experiential correlates, along with commonly used complementary assessments. These findings were organized into a unified global framework comprising two core components-dementia knowledge domains and correlates-supplemented by a component addressing affective dispositions towards dementia and an action list to guide future research. The framework aims to provide a foundational basis for enhancing inter-study comparisons and deepening our understanding of dementia knowledge and attitudes across diverse communities.
conclusionAligning methodologies for surveying dementia knowledge through a common framework can empower stakeholders to implement effective educational programs, fostering an informed and supportive environment for individuals affected by dementia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.