ArticleBMC public health2024
Experiences of policy-advisors in capacity, opportunity and motivation for implementing local tobacco control.
Article in BMC public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The effectiveness of cognitive behavioral therapy for smoking cessation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of behavioral medicine · 2025Pooled it
- [Tobacco control at the local level: what drives municipalities to take action?]TSG : tijdschrift voor gezondheidswetenschappen · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionDue to decades of decentralisation of public health policies, local governments have been given increased tobacco control responsibilities across European countries. Previous studies suggest that implementing local tobacco control policies is not without challenges (e.g., lack of resources and enforcement capabilities). This study investigates the policy implementation of both smoke-free environments and smoking cessation support services by local public health professionals in the Netherlands.
methodWe interviewed 24 officials of regional public health departments about the barriers and facilitators of implementing local tobacco control policies. Interviews were transcribed, analysed and classified using the Behaviour Change Wheel model (COM-B) comprising of the three components capability, opportunity, and motivation.
resultsPersonal motivation was an important condition for public health professionals to work on specific subtopics within tobacco control. Smoke-free environments were generally considered most motivating to work on, but also involve practical obstacles such as a lack of enforcement capabilities. Smoking cessation support services were reported to be less attractive to work on, as there are no clear guidelines on what public health professionals could and should do regarding smoking cessation support.
conclusionMunicipalities and local public health departments may contribute to tobacco control by creating smoke-free areas and offering services to help people stop smoking. The national government of the Netherlands could support local governments by providing clearer guidelines on creating smoke-free spaces and on how to improve local smoking cessation support services.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.