ArticleBMC health services research2024
"You go an extra mile": a qualitative study of community health worker perspectives in a health promotion intervention in urban South Africa.
Article in BMC health services research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Retention in theBMJ global health · 2025Trial
- Delivering low-intensity psychological interventions in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review and meta-ethnographic synthesis of lay health workers' experiences.Global mental health (Cambridge, England) · 2026Review
- Participants' perceptions of the preconception phase of theWomen's health (London, England)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAs part of the Healthy Life Trajectories Initiative in South Africa, the Bukhali health promotion intervention is being implemented by community health workers (CHW's) with young women in urban Soweto. The perspectives of these CHW's have not been fully explored.
methodsA qualitative study was conducted to describe CHW's perspectives and experiences of delivering the Bukhali intervention. Three focus groups were conducted with the 13 CHWs employed at the time of the study, and a thematic approach was taken to data analysis.
resultsThemes identified included: contextual realities for participants and CHWs, building relationships with participants, workload, emotional toll, and learning and development. Since they are recruited from Soweto, CHWs experienced similar contextual challenges to participants, and have to manage multiple roles, including health promotion and education, referral and support within the health system, counselling (although out of their scope of work), and data recording. The findings indicate the critical role CHWs play in building relationships with participants, especially establishing trust. Many CHWs spoke about going beyond what was expected in their role, which sometimes involved taking participants to medical facilities, and sharing resources with their participants. They spoke about the emotional toll of managing these relationships, their workload, and particularly the need for resilience and boundaries. CHWs experienced learning and development in their role as positive.
conclusionsThese findings provide a voice for these CHWs, but they also offer important learning of the implementation of the Bukhali intervention within the context of Soweto, as well as, future potential scale-up of CHW-delivered interventions in South Africa and other low- and middle-income countries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.