ArticleBMC nursing2024
Development and psychometric testing of the psychological capital questionnaire for nurses.
Article in BMC nursing, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Psychological capital and mental health among Chinese university students: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC psychology · 2026Pooled it
- The impact of received support on distressing experiences among nurses as second victims: the mediating role of psychological capital.BMC nursing · 2026Article
- Entitlement, Job Performance, and Flourishing Among Nurses: An International Mediation Analysis Study.SAGE open nursingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPsychological capital (PsyCap) is a positive internal resource for individuals, playing a crucial role in mental health. Evaluating nurses' psychological capital is important for understanding their mental well-being, as they face unique occupational stressors. However, existing PsyCap questionnaires are developed for various other professions such as enterprise employees, teachers, patients, teenagers, and civil servants, making them less suitable for the nursing profession. The main aim of this study is to develop and validate a Psychological Capital Questionnaire specifically tailored to the nursing occupation in Chinese clinical settings.
methodsThis is a multi-stage, cross-sectional study conducted between March 2022 and May 2023. Preliminary items of the scale were generated through a literature review, theoretical research, and the Delphi method. The final questionnaire was validated through two rounds of data collection. In the first stage, 236 nurses were selected using purposive sampling for item analysis, exploratory factor analysis (EFA)and reliability testing. In the second stage, data were collected from 494 nurses using convenience sampling to conduct confirmatory factor analysis (CFA).
resultsThe final questionnaire contains 30 items, with six factors extracted by EFA, accounting for 77.59% of the total variance. The confirmatory factor analysis showed good model fit, with the following indices: χ²/df = 4.052, GFI = 0.836, CFI = 0.938, TLI = 0.926, NFI = 0.919, RMSEA = 0.079, RMR = 0.030. The reliability measures were high, with a Cronbach's α of 0.976, split-half coefficient of 0.976, and test-retest reliability of 0.941 and 0.963.
conclusionsThe Psychological Capital Questionnaire for Nurses exhibits strong psychometric properties, making it a valuable tool for assessing the psychological capital of nurses in Chinese clinical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.