ArticleBMC rheumatology2024
The association between composite dietary antioxidant index and rheumatoid arthritis: evidence from NHANES 2001-2020.
Article in BMC rheumatology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Investigating the Relationship Between Dietary Antioxidant Index With Anthropometric Indices, Clinical Symptoms, Inflammatory Markers, Sleep Quality and Quality of Life in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Cross-Sectional Study.Health science reports · 2026Article
- Insights into vitamin C in musculoskeletal physiology and disorders: mechanisms and translational perspectives.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Article
- The Role of Vitamin C in Selected Autoimmune and Immune-Mediated Diseases: Exploring Potential Therapeutic Benefits.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Association between hepatitis C virus infection and rheumatoid arthritis: a nationwide cross-sectional study.BMC rheumatology · 2025Article
- Association between composite dietary antioxidant index and rheumatoid arthritis: results from NHANES 2003-2018.International journal of medical sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study aimed to investigate the relationship between the composite dietary antioxidant index (CDAI) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) using data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) spanning from 2001 to 2020.
methodsCDAI is based on the intake of vitamins A, C, E, manganese, selenium, and zinc from the diet. RA patients were identified through questionnaire responses. Weighted multivariate regression analysis was employed to examine the association between CDAI and RA. Additionally, restricted cubic splines were utilized to assess potential non-linear relationships. Subgroup analyses were used to explore whether the relationship between CDAI and RA remained consistent across subgroups (e.g., sex, age, smoking status, etc.). We also used interaction terms to assess whether these subgroup variables influence the relationship between CDAI and RA risk. Finally, we also performed sensitivity analyses to assess the robustness of the main findings after excluding patients with a history of diabetes.
resultsThe study included a total of 11,266 patients. After adjusting for all covariates, the multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that each unit increase in CDAI was associated with a 4% reduction in the odds of RA (odds ratio = 0.96, 95% confidence interval = 0.94-0.99). The incidence of RA was found to decrease as CDAI levels increased (P for trend < 0.05). In the restricted cubic spline analysis, a linear relationship between CDAI and RA was observed. Subgroup analyses and interactions demonstrated that the negative association between CDAI and RA was consistent across all subgroups and was influenced by smoking.
conclusionThis study indicates a negative correlation between CDAI and RA, suggesting that CDAI may serve as a valuable and convenient marker for reducing the risk of RA in US adults. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.