ArticleGenome medicine2024
A tool for CRISPR-Cas9 sgRNA evaluation based on computational models of gene expression.
Article in Genome medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- From Code to Life: The AI-Driven Revolution in Genome Editing.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Review
- Structural Characterisation of TetR/AcrR Regulators inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCRISPR is widely used to silence genes by inducing mutations expected to nullify their expression. While numerous computational tools have been developed to design single-guide RNAs (sgRNAs) with high cutting efficiency and minimal off-target effects, only a few tools focus specifically on predicting gene knockouts following CRISPR. These tools consider factors like conservation, amino acid composition, and frameshift likelihood. However, they neglect the impact of CRISPR on gene expression, which can dramatically affect the success of CRISPR-induced gene silencing attempts. Furthermore, information regarding gene expression can be useful even when the objective is not to silence a gene. Therefore, a tool that considers gene expression when predicting CRISPR outcomes is lacking.
resultsWe developed EXPosition, the first computational tool that combines models predicting gene knockouts after CRISPR with models that forecast gene expression, offering more accurate predictions of gene knockout outcomes. EXPosition leverages deep-learning models to predict key steps in gene expression: transcription, splicing, and translation initiation. We showed our tool performs better at predicting gene knockout than existing tools across 6 datasets, 4 cell types and ~207k sgRNAs. We also validated our gene expression models using the ClinVar dataset by showing enrichment of pathogenic mutations in high-scoring mutations according to our models.
conclusionsWe believe EXPosition will enhance both the efficiency and accuracy of genome editing projects, by directly predicting CRISPR's effect on various aspects of gene expression. EXPosition is available at http://www.cs.tau.ac.il/~tamirtul/EXPosition . The source code is available at https://github.com/shaicoh3n/EXPosition .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.