Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39716179›Full record

Trial reportBMC medical education2024

Effectiveness of the application of small private online course combined with PBL model based on massive open online course in the teaching of neurology.

Xiaoling Li, Fanju Li, Wei Liu, Qinfang Xie, Boyao Yuan, Lijuan Wang, Manxia Wang

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC medical education, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Xiaoling Li *Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, The Second Hospital & Clinical Medical School, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730000, China.
Fanju Li *Department of Neurology, The Second Hospital & Clinical Medical School, Lanzhou University, No. 82, Cuyingmen, Chengguan District, Lanzhou, 730000, China.
Wei LiuDepartment of Neurology, The Second Hospital & Clinical Medical School, Lanzhou University, No. 82, Cuyingmen, Chengguan District, Lanzhou, 730000, China.
Qinfang XieDepartment of Neurology, The Second Hospital & Clinical Medical School, Lanzhou University, No. 82, Cuyingmen, Chengguan District, Lanzhou, 730000, China.
Boyao YuanDepartment of Neurology, The Second Hospital & Clinical Medical School, Lanzhou University, No. 82, Cuyingmen, Chengguan District, Lanzhou, 730000, China.
Lijuan WangDepartment of Neurology, The Second Hospital & Clinical Medical School, Lanzhou University, No. 82, Cuyingmen, Chengguan District, Lanzhou, 730000, China.
Manxia WangDepartment of Neurology, The Second Hospital & Clinical Medical School, Lanzhou University, No. 82, Cuyingmen, Chengguan District, Lanzhou, 730000, China. ery_lixlery@lzu.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDue to the complex and abstract anatomy of the nervous system, neurology has become a difficult subject for students of clinical disciplines. It is imperative to develop new teaching methods to improve students' enthusiasm for learning this course. Small private online courses (SPOC) combined with problem based learning (PBL) blended teaching models based on massive open online course (MOOC) provides a new direction for future neurology teaching reform. This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of applying SPOC combined with PBL in neurology teaching.

methodsThis study was conducted during the 2020 intake of undergraduate students at the Second Hospital and Clinical Medical School, Lanzhou University. A total of 48 students were enrolled in the study and randomly assigned to either a Lecture-Based Learning (LBL) group or a SPOC + PBL group, with 24 participants in each group. After the classes, comparisons were made between the two groups in terms of teaching methods, increases in learning interest, level of participation in learning, satisfaction, and closed-book unit test scores.

resultsThe average unit test score of the SPOC + PBL group was 84.29 ± 1.65, the average score of LBL group was 77.0 ± 1.92. The difference in average scores between the two groups was statistically significant (P < 0.01). The proportion of students with 91-100 points in SPOC + PBL group was higher than that of LBL group, and the difference was statistically significant, P < 0.01. Student satisfaction survey in the SPOC + PBL group was significantly higher than that in the LBL group, P < 0.01.

conclusionsThe application of SPOC combined with PBL teaching based on MOOC in neurology teaching may be more effective than traditional LBL model. It is expected to help medical students overcome the "fear" of learning neurological diseases, improve the teaching effect of neurology courses, and meet the needs of modern medical education by employing a hybrid course structure and adopting a problem-oriented approach.

Indexed as

Education, Medical, UndergraduateNeurologyProblem-Based LearningChinaComputer-Assisted InstructionCurriculumEducational MeasurementEducation, DistanceFemaleHumansMaleModels, EducationalStudents, MedicalTeachingInstructional effectivenessNeurology teachingPBLSPOC

Identifiers

PMID39716179
PMCPMC11667845

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.