Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39716141›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2024

Predictors and outcomes of premature rupture of membranes among pregnant women admitted to a teaching Hospital in Saudi Arabia: a cohort study.

Hayfaa Wahabi, Hala Elmorshedy, Hanadi Bakhsh, Samia Ahmed, Raghad E AlSubki, Amsha S Aburasyin, Amel Fayed, Amal Mahmoud Ibrahim Goda

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Hayfaa WahabiResearch Chair for Evidence-Based Health Care and Knowledge Translation, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Hala ElmorshedyDepartment of Tropical Health, High Institute of Public Health, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt.
Hanadi BakhshDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine, Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. habakhsh@pnu.edu.sa.
Samia AhmedResearch Chair for Evidence-Based Health Care and Knowledge Translation, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Raghad E AlSubkiCollege of Medicine, Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Amsha S AburasyinDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine, King Saud University, King Saud University Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Amel FayedDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, College of Medicine, Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Amal Mahmoud Ibrahim GodaDepartment of Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Ain-Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.

Funding

Deputyship for Research and Innovation Ministry of Education in Saudi Arabia WE-44-0086
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPremature rupture of the membrane (PROM), refers to rupture of the fetal membranes prior to the onset of regular uterine contractions. When this occurs at term (≥ 37 weeks of gestation), it is classified as PROM, whereas if it occurs before 37 weeks, it is termed preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM). PROM and PPROM are linked to adverse outcomes for both mother and newborn.

objectivesTo investigate the factors associated with PROM and the outcomes of pregnancies complicated with PROM.

methodsThis was a retrospective cohort study. The participants were divided into three groups; those with PROM, those with PPROM and a control group who had normal onset of membranes rupture. The groups were compared with respect to predictors of PROM (maternal demographic profile, obstetrical history, and comorbidities), in addition to outcomes (postpartum hemorrhage, hospital stay, low APGAR scores, sepsis, low birthweight, preterm rate, and admission to neonatal Intensive care Unit (NICU)). Multivariable logistic regression model was used for predicting risk factors associated with PROM and PPROM.

resultsA total of 1,894 pregnant women were enrolled in the study, 77.6% had normal onset of ruptured membranes, while 382 (20.1%) were diagnosed with a PROM and 43 (2.3%) diagnosed with PPROM. Primiparous mothers were more likely to develop PROM (AOR = 1.56, 95% CI (1.10-2.22)) as compared to multiparous, while obese and overweight mothers were less likely to develop PPROM (AOR = 0.86, 95% CI (0.94 - 0.49)). Significantly more mothers with PPROM were delivered by emergency cesarean Sect. (30.2% vs. 22.9%, P < 0.01), develop chorioamnionitis (4.7% vs. 0.1%, P < 0.01), and stayed in the hospital more than three days (16.3% vs. 2.5%, P < 0.01) compared to the control group. Neonates of mothers who had PPROM were more likely to have low birth weight (35.7% vs. 10.4%, P < 0.01), and NICU admission (67.4% vs. 20.4%, P < 0.01) as compared to the control group. Perinatal death rate was not significantly different between the groups.

conclusionIn this study, nulliparity is a predictor of PROM, while overweight/ obese mothers are less likely to develop PPROM. Despite the relatively low occurrence of PPROM among Saudi women, the condition is associate with increase risk of cesarean section delivery, chorioamnionitis, prolonged hospitalization, and an increase need for neonatal intensive care compare to those with a normal onset of membrane rupture.

Indexed as

Hospitals, TeachingPregnancy OutcomePremature Rupture of Fetal MembranesAdultApgar ScoreCohort StudiesFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornIntensive Care Units, NeonatalLength of StayPostpartum HemorrhagePregnancyPremature BirthRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsChorioamnionitisPregnancy outcomesPrelabour rupture of the membranesSaudi Arabia

Identifiers

PMID39716141
PMCPMC11667829

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.