Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39716131›Full record

ArticleBMC geriatrics2024

COVID-19 vaccine safety and effectiveness at 3 months in institutionalized old people.

Mathilde Malignac, Adrien Besseiche, Anaïs Cloppet-Fontaine, Mohand Ouali Sadeg, Jamileh Jafarbay, Mathilde Gourdon, Christophe Trivalle, Claude Jeandel, Jean-Sébastien Vidal, Olivier Hanon and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC geriatrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Mathilde MalignacUniversité de Paris, EA 4468, APHP, Hôpital Broca, Paris, France.
Adrien BesseicheGérontopôle d'Ile-de-France, Paris, France.
Anaïs Cloppet-FontaineGérontopôle d'Ile-de-France, Paris, France.
Mohand Ouali SadegUSLD and EHPAD, hôpital de Plaisir Grignon, Plaisir, France.
Jamileh JafarbayUSLD and EHPAD Centre de gérontologie Les Abondances, Boulogne-Billancourt, France.
Mathilde GourdonAPHP, Hôpital Sainte Périne, Paris, France.
Christophe TrivalleUniversité Paris-Saclay, APHP, Hôpital Paul Brousse, Villejuif, France.
Claude JeandelUniversité de Montpellier, CHRU Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Jean-Sébastien VidalUniversité de Paris, EA 4468, APHP, Hôpital Broca, Paris, France.
Olivier HanonUniversité de Paris, EA 4468, APHP, Hôpital Broca, Paris, France. olivier.hanon@aphp.fr.
COGEVAX study

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOlder age and associated comorbid conditions increase the risk of severe form of COVID-19 and death. The SARS-CoV-2 vaccination campaign began in France in December 2020 targeting institutionalized older population before having been evaluated in this population. The objective of our study was to assess the tolerability of vaccination 21 days (D21) and 90 days after the first vaccination (D90) in institutionalized old people. Secondary objective was to assess its effectiveness (mortality, hospitalization and occurrence of COVID) at D21 and D90.

methodsPeople living in nursing homes or in long-term hospitalization facilities in France were included 12-2020-06-2021. They were divided into SARS-CoV-2 vaccinated and unvaccinated groups. Vaccine tolerability was prospectively assessed by the occurrence of health events at D21 and D90 (local and systemic side effects, geriatric syndromes, cardiovascular events). Vaccine efficacy was assessed by the occurrence of COVID-19 and serious adverse events (unscheduled hospitalization and all-cause mortality).

resultsThe mean age of the 2595 participants was 86 years, 83% received COVID-19 vaccine. There were no significant difference between the vaccinated and unvaccinated for systemic or local adverse events at D21 and D90. At D90, vaccinated participants had significantly fewer SARS-CoV-2 infections (odds ratio (95% confidence interval) = 0.35 (0.22-0.58)), fewer deaths or hospitalizations (0.50 (0.31-0.81)), fewer cardiovascular events (0.28 (0.12-0.64)) and fewer pressure ulcers (0.38 (0.17-0.88)).

conclusionsIn this prospective cohort study, COVID-19 vaccine in a very old institutionalized geriatric population had a reassuring safety profile and a protective effect on COVID-19, hospitalizations and deaths, cardiovascular events and pressure ulcers.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleFranceHospitalizationHumansInstitutionalizationMaleNursing HomesProspective StudiesVaccinationVaccine EfficacyCOVID-19 VaccinesCOVID-19COVID-19 vaccineGeriatric populationInstitutionalizationNursing home

Identifiers

PMID39716131
PMCPMC11664901

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.