ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2024
A comprehensive and bias-free machine learning approach for risk prediction of preeclampsia with severe features in a nulliparous study cohort.
Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- AI-powered risk prediction models for preventable maternal mortality in rural settings: a systematic review.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Pooled it
- Development of a predictive model for preeclampsia utilizing time-of-flight mass spectrometry based on novel nanomaterials integrated with machine learning.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2026Article
- Eclampsia risk prediction across diverse U.S. populations using CDC data: machine learning versus ACOG checklists.AJOG global reports · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence for predicting and preventing adverse pregnancy outcomes addressing bias and clinical translation.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Review
- Prevalence and risk factors associated with severe features of pre-eclampsia among women in Thailand.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2025Article
- Reporting of Fairness Metrics in Clinical Risk Prediction Models Used for Precision Health: Scoping Review.Online journal of public health informatics · 2025Review
- Early Prediction of Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy Using Machine Learning and Medical Records from the First and Second Trimesters.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2024Article
- Reimagining Placental Perfusion in Preeclampsia: Integrating Doppler Ultrasound, Three-dimensional Vascular Indices, and Predictive Artificial Intelligence.Journal of medical ultrasoundReview
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Preeclampsia is one of the leading causes of maternal morbidity, with consequences during and after pregnancy. Because of its diverse clinical presentation, preeclampsia is an adverse pregnancy outcome that is uniquely challenging to predict and manage. In this paper, we developed racial bias-free machine learning models that predict the onset of preeclampsia with severe features or eclampsia at discrete time points in a nulliparous pregnant study cohort. To focus on those most at risk, we selected probands with severe PE (sPE). Those with mild preeclampsia, superimposed preeclampsia, and new onset hypertension were excluded.The prospective study cohort to which we applied machine learning is the Nulliparous Pregnancy Outcomes Study: Monitoring Mothers-to-be (nuMoM2b) study, which contains information from eight clinical sites across the US. Maternal serum samples were collected for 1,857 individuals between the first and second trimesters. These patients with serum samples collected are selected as the final cohort.Our prediction models achieved an AUROC of 0.72 (95% CI, 0.69-0.76), 0.75 (95% CI, 0.71-0.79), and 0.77 (95% CI, 0.74-0.80), respectively, for the three visits. Our initial models were biased toward non-Hispanic black participants with a high predictive equality ratio of 1.31. We corrected this bias and reduced this ratio to 1.14. This lowers the rate of false positives in our predictive model for the non-Hispanic black participants. The exact cause of the bias is still under investigation, but previous studies have recognized PLGF as a potential bias-inducing factor. However, since our model includes various factors that exhibit a positive correlation with PLGF, such as blood pressure measurements and BMI, we have employed an algorithmic approach to disentangle this bias from the model.The top features of our built model stress the importance of using several tests, particularly for biomarkers (BMI and blood pressure measurements) and ultrasound measurements. Placental analytes (PLGF and Endoglin) were strong predictors for screening for the early onset of preeclampsia with severe features in the first two trimesters.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.