Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39716098›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2024

A comprehensive and bias-free machine learning approach for risk prediction of preeclampsia with severe features in a nulliparous study cohort.

Yun C Lin, Daniel Mallia, Andrea O Clark-Sevilla, Adam Catto, Alisa Leshchenko, Qi Yan, David M Haas, Ronald Wapner, Itsik Pe'er, Anita Raja and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Yun C LinDepartment of Computer Science, Columbia University, 1214 Amsterdam Ave, 721 Schapiro CEPSR, New York, NY, 10027, USA. ycl2112@columbia.edu.
Daniel MalliaDepartment of Computer Science, CUNY Hunter College, New York, NY, USA.
Andrea O Clark-SevillaDepartment of Computer Science, Columbia University, 1214 Amsterdam Ave, 721 Schapiro CEPSR, New York, NY, 10027, USA.
Adam CattoDepartment of Computer Science, CUNY Hunter College, New York, NY, USA.
Alisa LeshchenkoDepartment of Computer Science, CUNY Hunter College, New York, NY, USA.
Qi YanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
David M HaasDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Ronald WapnerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Itsik Pe'erDepartment of Computer Science, Columbia University, 1214 Amsterdam Ave, 721 Schapiro CEPSR, New York, NY, 10027, USA.
Anita RajaDepartment of Computer Science, CUNY Hunter College, New York, NY, USA.
Ansaf Salleb-AouissiDepartment of Computer Science, Columbia University, 1214 Amsterdam Ave, 721 Schapiro CEPSR, New York, NY, 10027, USA.

Funding

SCH: Prediction of Preterm Birth in Nulliparous WomenR01LM013327 · NLM · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI FRIEDMAN, ALEXANDER M, PE'ER, ITSHACK G · 2019 to 2022
$1.2M
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development R01LM013327NLM NIH HHS R01 LM013327
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Preeclampsia is one of the leading causes of maternal morbidity, with consequences during and after pregnancy. Because of its diverse clinical presentation, preeclampsia is an adverse pregnancy outcome that is uniquely challenging to predict and manage. In this paper, we developed racial bias-free machine learning models that predict the onset of preeclampsia with severe features or eclampsia at discrete time points in a nulliparous pregnant study cohort. To focus on those most at risk, we selected probands with severe PE (sPE). Those with mild preeclampsia, superimposed preeclampsia, and new onset hypertension were excluded.The prospective study cohort to which we applied machine learning is the Nulliparous Pregnancy Outcomes Study: Monitoring Mothers-to-be (nuMoM2b) study, which contains information from eight clinical sites across the US. Maternal serum samples were collected for 1,857 individuals between the first and second trimesters. These patients with serum samples collected are selected as the final cohort.Our prediction models achieved an AUROC of 0.72 (95% CI, 0.69-0.76), 0.75 (95% CI, 0.71-0.79), and 0.77 (95% CI, 0.74-0.80), respectively, for the three visits. Our initial models were biased toward non-Hispanic black participants with a high predictive equality ratio of 1.31. We corrected this bias and reduced this ratio to 1.14. This lowers the rate of false positives in our predictive model for the non-Hispanic black participants. The exact cause of the bias is still under investigation, but previous studies have recognized PLGF as a potential bias-inducing factor. However, since our model includes various factors that exhibit a positive correlation with PLGF, such as blood pressure measurements and BMI, we have employed an algorithmic approach to disentangle this bias from the model.The top features of our built model stress the importance of using several tests, particularly for biomarkers (BMI and blood pressure measurements) and ultrasound measurements. Placental analytes (PLGF and Endoglin) were strong predictors for screening for the early onset of preeclampsia with severe features in the first two trimesters.

Indexed as

Machine LearningParityPre-EclampsiaAdultBiomarkersCohort StudiesFemaleHumansPlacenta Growth FactorPregnancyPregnancy Trimester, FirstPregnancy Trimester, SecondProspective StudiesRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsSeverity of Illness IndexBiomarkersPlacenta Growth FactorEnsemble modelFairness in machine learningMachine learningPlGFPreeclampsiaPreeclampsia with severe features

Identifiers

PMID39716098
PMCPMC11667971

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.