Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39716086›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2024

Transcriptomic profiling reveals distinct responses to beet curly top virus (BCTV) infection in resistant and susceptible sugar beet genotypes.

Jordan Withycombe, Jinlong Han, Jacob MacWilliams, Kevin M Dorn, Vamsi J Nalam, Punya Nachappa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jordan WithycombeDepartment of Agricultural Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, 80523, USA.
Jinlong HanDepartment of Agricultural Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, 80523, USA.
Jacob MacWilliamsDepartment of Agricultural Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, 80523, USA.
Kevin M DornSoil Management and Sugarbeet Research, USDA-ARS, Fort Collins, CO, 80523, USA.
Vamsi J NalamDepartment of Agricultural Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, 80523, USA. vamsi.nalam@colostate.edu.
Punya NachappaDepartment of Agricultural Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, 80523, USA. punya.nachappa@colostate.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSugar beets (Beta vulgaris L.) are grown worldwide and suffer economic loss annually due to curly top disease caused by the beet curly top virus (BCTV). The virus is spread by the beet leafhopper (BLH), Circulifer tenellus Baker. Current management strategies rely on chemical control and planting BCTV-resistant sugar beet genotypes. However, the genetic mechanism underlying BCTV resistance in sugar beet is unknown. This study aimed to determine these mechanisms by comparing a resistant (EL10) and susceptible (FC709-2) sugar beet genotype using host plant suitability (no-choice), host preference (choice) assays, and transcriptomic analysis.

resultsHost plant suitability assays revealed no significant differences in adult survival or nymph production between viruliferous and non-viruliferous BLH on either genotype, suggesting that BCTV resistance is not directly associated with reduced beet leafhopper fitness. However, host preference assays showed that viruliferous BLH preferred settling on the susceptible genotype, FC709-2, compared to the resistant genotype, EL10 whereas the non-viruliferous BLH showed no preference. RNA-sequencing analysis of BCTV-inoculated (viruliferous BLH-fed) and mock-inoculated (non-viruliferous BLH-fed) plants at day 1, 7, or 14 post-inoculations highlighted dynamic and contrasting responses between the two genotypes. The resistant genotype had differentially expressed transcripts (DETs) associated with jasmonic acid and abscisic acid biosynthesis and signaling. DETs associated with stress mitigation mechanisms and reduction in plant primary metabolic processes were also observed. In contrast, the susceptible genotype had DETs associated with opposing phytohormones like salicylic acid and auxin. Moreover, this genotype exhibited an upregulation in DETs involved in volatile organic compounds (VOCs) production and increased primary plant metabolic processes.

conclusionsThese results provide novel insight into the opposing transcriptional responses underlying BCTV resistance and susceptibility in sugar beet. Understanding and classifying the mechanisms of resistance or susceptibility to BCTV infection in sugar beet is beneficial to researchers and plant breeders as it provides a basis for further exploration of the host plant-virus-vector interactions.

Indexed as

Beta vulgarisDisease ResistanceGene Expression ProfilingGenotypePlant DiseasesAnimalsGeminiviridaeGene Expression Regulation, PlantHemipteraTranscriptomeBeet leafhopperBeta vulgarisPlant defensesPlant-virus interactionsRNA-sequencing

Identifiers

PMID39716086
PMCPMC11668037

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.