Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39716070›Full record

ArticleBMC microbiology2024

Which is more priority, substrate type or food quality? A case study on a tropical coral reef sea cucumber Stichopus chloronotus revealed by prokaryotic biomarker.

Chunyang Sun, Yanan Wang, Chenghao Jia, Fei Gao, Yun Rong, Boxuan Feng, Kunzhi Yao, Qiang Xu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC microbiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Chunyang SunSchool of Ecology, Hainan University, Haikou, 570228, China.
Yanan WangSchool of Marine Biology and Fisheries, Hainan University, Haikou, 570228, China.
Chenghao JiaSchool of Ecology, Hainan University, Haikou, 570228, China.
Fei GaoSchool of Marine Biology and Fisheries, Hainan University, Haikou, 570228, China.
Yun RongSchool of Marine Biology and Fisheries, Hainan University, Haikou, 570228, China.
Boxuan FengSchool of Marine Biology and Fisheries, Hainan University, Haikou, 570228, China.
Kunzhi YaoSchool of Marine Biology and Fisheries, Hainan University, Haikou, 570228, China.
Qiang XuSchool of Marine Biology and Fisheries, Hainan University, Haikou, 570228, China. xuqianghnu@hainanu.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDifferent species of sea cucumbers in various regions have diverse preferred habitats and feeding habits. However, detailed research on the correlation between food selection and habitat preference of sea cucumbers, as well as their adaptive adjustments to specific habitat types, is still lacking.

methodsA field study was carried out to explore the relationship between food selection and habitat preference, as well as the adaptation process, of the tropical sea cucumber Stichopus chloronotus, which has specific food preferences. This was achieved using an in situ mesocosm method with three single habitat types: sandy, broken coral branches, and reef. Changes is the prokaryotic community structure of gut contents, revealed by high-throughput sequencing analysis of the 16S rRNA gene, were used as the biomarker. Tax4Fun assessed the metabolic pathways of samples, and FAPROTAX evaluated the biogeochemical cycling processes.

resultsAlpha diversity, PCoA, and UPGMA tree analyses consistently revealed that bacterial community structures in the gut contents of S. chloronotus in reef bottom cages (GRee) are closely related to those of wild S. chloronotus collected in September (GWS) and October (GWO) than those from the sandy bottom (GSan) and broken coral branches bottom (GBra) cages. The relative abundance of Ruegeria is one of the dominant genera in the control groups (GWS and GWO), while Synechococcus CC9902 is among the predominant genera in the treatment groups (GSan, GBra and GRee). Functional prediction outcomes from Tax4Fun and FAPROTAX also indicate that the metabolic pathways in the gut contents of the treatment groups are distinct from those of the control groups.

conclusionsCompared with S. chloronotus in single habitat types, wild S. chloronotus showed stronger feeding selectivity and ingested actively larger proportion of Ruegeria sp. For this picky species, hard-substrate habitats that can keep it away from strong waves seem to be more important to than those with good sedimentary food. Inappropriate habitats without stable substrate for attachment may cause an unusual change in food preference of S. chloronotus. Tax4Fun and FAPROTAX functional annotation also confirmed that the adaptive adjustment of S. chloronotus can be completed within a month.

Indexed as

BacteriaCoral ReefsRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSea CucumbersAnimalsBiomarkersDNA, BacterialEcosystemFood PreferencesGastrointestinal MicrobiomeHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingPhylogenyBiomarkersDNA, BacterialRNA, Ribosomal, 16S16S rRNAFeeding adaptabilityGut contentsHabitat typeStichopus chloronotus

Identifiers

PMID39716070
PMCPMC11665211

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.