ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2025
Decision Tree for Protein Biomarker Selection for Clinical Applications.
Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Discovery of novel protein biomarkers for clinical applications is an active research field across a manifold of diseases. Despite some successes and progress, the biomarker development pipeline still frequently ends in failure. Biomarker candidates that are discovered by appropriate technologies such as unbiased mass spectrometry cannot be validated or translated to immunoassays in many cases. Selection of strong disease biomarker candidates that further constitute suitable targets for antibody binding in immunoassays is thus important to allow routine clinical use. This essential selection step can be supported and rationalized using bioinformatics tools such as protein databases. Here, we present a workflow in the form of decision trees to computationally investigate biomarker candidates and their available affinity reagents in depth. This analysis can identify the most promising biomarker candidates for assay development, while minimal time and effort are required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39716013What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.