Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39715992›Full record

ArticleDrugs - real world outcomes2025

Association Between Inappropriate Prescribing According to the 2023 Beers Criteria and Different Health Outcomes: A 1-Year Longitudinal Study in Community-Dwelling Older Adults.

Rosiane Mendes da Silva, Alessandra Lamas Granero Lucchetti, Maria Eduarda Corradi Ferreira, Leonardo Oliveira Silva, Oscarina da Silva Ezequiel, Eduardo Luiz Mendonça Martins, Giancarlo Lucchetti

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Drugs - real world outcomes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Rosiane Mendes da SilvaSchool of Medicine, Federal University of Juiz de Fora, Av. Eugênio do Nascimento s/no Bairro: Dom Bosco, Juiz de Fora, MG, 36038-330, Brazil.
Alessandra Lamas Granero LucchettiSchool of Medicine, Federal University of Juiz de Fora, Av. Eugênio do Nascimento s/no Bairro: Dom Bosco, Juiz de Fora, MG, 36038-330, Brazil.
Maria Eduarda Corradi FerreiraSchool of Medicine, Federal University of Juiz de Fora, Av. Eugênio do Nascimento s/no Bairro: Dom Bosco, Juiz de Fora, MG, 36038-330, Brazil.
Leonardo Oliveira SilvaSchool of Medicine, Federal University of Juiz de Fora, Av. Eugênio do Nascimento s/no Bairro: Dom Bosco, Juiz de Fora, MG, 36038-330, Brazil.
Oscarina da Silva EzequielSchool of Medicine, Federal University of Juiz de Fora, Av. Eugênio do Nascimento s/no Bairro: Dom Bosco, Juiz de Fora, MG, 36038-330, Brazil.
Eduardo Luiz Mendonça MartinsSchool of Medicine, Federal University of Juiz de Fora, Av. Eugênio do Nascimento s/no Bairro: Dom Bosco, Juiz de Fora, MG, 36038-330, Brazil.
Giancarlo LucchettiSchool of Medicine, Federal University of Juiz de Fora, Av. Eugênio do Nascimento s/no Bairro: Dom Bosco, Juiz de Fora, MG, 36038-330, Brazil. g.lucchetti@yahoo.com.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5384-9476

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThis study aimed to investigate the association between the 2023 Beers criteria for inappropriate prescribing and different health outcomes among community-dwelling older individuals after a 1-year follow-up period and to assess the use and factors associated with inappropriate prescribing.

methodsThis longitudinal population study spanning from 2017 to 2018 included 490 community-dwelling older adults (≥60 years old) receiving care from family medicine teams in the city of São João del-Rei, Brazil. The 2023 Beers criteria was used to identify potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs). Community health workers carried out interviews assessing different health outcomes, such as cognition, sleep, mental health, quality of life, successful aging, and life satisfaction. Generalized estimating equations were used to evaluate whether the presence of PIMs was longitudinally associated with diverse outcomes following the 1-year follow-up period.

resultsA total of 255 (52%) of the participants used at least one PIM. The most common PIMs were benzodiazepines (36.5-38.3%), followed by proton pump inhibitors (16.2-18.4%) and sulfonylureas (9.8-10.6%). Some sociodemographic factors (e.g., marital status and race) and clinical factors (e.g., difficulties in activities of daily living and the number of diseases) were associated with the presence and/or number of PIMs at baseline. In the longitudinal analysis, the presence of PIMs exhibited associations with a spectrum of outcomes observed after a 1-year follow-up period. These outcomes included diminished physical quality of life (B = -0.21; p = 0.030), disrupted sleep patterns (B = 1.14; p < 0.001), compromised mental health-depression (B = 1.04; p = 0.041), stress (B = 2.00; p = 0.001), and anxiety (B = 1.26; p = 0.004), successful aging (B = -1.92; p = 0.033), and satisfaction with life (B = -0.77; p = 0.013).

conclusionThe use of at least one PIM, according to the 2023 Beers criteria, was high and associated with worse health outcomes. This underscores the imperative for healthcare professionals to exercise caution when prescribing medications to older patients.

Identifiers

PMID39715992
PMCPMC11829865

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.