Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39715960›Full record

ArticleVisual computing for industry, biomedicine, and art2024

Semi-supervised contour-driven broad learning system for autonomous segmentation of concealed prohibited baggage items.

Divya Velayudhan, Abdelfatah Ahmed, Taimur Hassan, Muhammad Owais, Neha Gour, Mohammed Bennamoun, Ernesto Damiani, Naoufel Werghi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Visual computing for industry, biomedicine, and art, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Divya Velayudhan *Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences, Center for Cyber-Physical Systems, Khalifa University of Science and Technology, Abu Dhabi, 127788, United Arab Emirates. 100058254@ku.ac.ae.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2897-570X
Abdelfatah Ahmed *Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences, Center for Cyber-Physical Systems, Khalifa University of Science and Technology, Abu Dhabi, 127788, United Arab Emirates.
Taimur HassanDepartment of Electrical, Computer and Biomedical Engineering, Abu Dhabi University, Abu Dhabi, 59911, United Arab Emirates.
Muhammad OwaisDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences, Center for Cyber-Physical Systems, Khalifa University of Science and Technology, Abu Dhabi, 127788, United Arab Emirates.
Neha GourDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences, Center for Cyber-Physical Systems, Khalifa University of Science and Technology, Abu Dhabi, 127788, United Arab Emirates.
Mohammed BennamounDepartment of Computer Science and Software Engineering, the University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, 6009, Australia.
Ernesto DamianiDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences, Center for Cyber-Physical Systems, Khalifa University of Science and Technology, Abu Dhabi, 127788, United Arab Emirates.
Naoufel WerghiDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences, Center for Cyber-Physical Systems, Khalifa University of Science and Technology, Abu Dhabi, 127788, United Arab Emirates.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the exponential rise in global air traffic, ensuring swift passenger processing while countering potential security threats has become a paramount concern for aviation security. Although X-ray baggage monitoring is now standard, manual screening has several limitations, including the propensity for errors, and raises concerns about passenger privacy. To address these drawbacks, researchers have leveraged recent advances in deep learning to design threat-segmentation frameworks. However, these models require extensive training data and labour-intensive dense pixel-wise annotations and are finetuned separately for each dataset to account for inter-dataset discrepancies. Hence, this study proposes a semi-supervised contour-driven broad learning system (BLS) for X-ray baggage security threat instance segmentation referred to as C-BLX. The research methodology involved enhancing representation learning and achieving faster training capability to tackle severe occlusion and class imbalance using a single training routine with limited baggage scans. The proposed framework was trained with minimal supervision using resource-efficient image-level labels to localize illegal items in multi-vendor baggage scans. More specifically, the framework generated candidate region segments from the input X-ray scans based on local intensity transition cues, effectively identifying concealed prohibited items without entire baggage scans. The multi-convolutional BLS exploits the rich complementary features extracted from these region segments to predict object categories, including threat and benign classes. The contours corresponding to the region segments predicted as threats were then utilized to yield the segmentation results. The proposed C-BLX system was thoroughly evaluated on three highly imbalanced public datasets and surpassed other competitive approaches in baggage-threat segmentation, yielding 90.04%, 78.92%, and 59.44% in terms of mIoU on GDXray, SIXray, and Compass-XP, respectively. Furthermore, the limitations of the proposed system in extracting precise region segments in intricate noisy settings and potential strategies for overcoming them through post-processing techniques were explored (source code will be available at https://github.com/Divs1159/CNN_BLS .).

Indexed as

Baggage X-ray imageryBroad learning systemsThreat detectionThreat segmentation

Identifiers

PMID39715960
PMCPMC11666859

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.