Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39715952›Full record

ArticleNature ecology & evolution2025

The cost of recovering Australia's threatened species.

April E Reside, Josie Carwardine, Michelle Ward, Chuanji Yong, Ruben Venegas Li, Andrew Rogers, Brendan A Wintle, Jennifer Silcock, John Woinarski, Mark Lintermans and 3 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature ecology & evolution, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

April E ResideSchool of the Environment, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia. a.reside@uq.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0760-9527
Josie CarwardineCSIRO, Land and Water, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Michelle WardSchool of the Environment, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0658-855X
Chuanji YongSchool of the Environment, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Ruben Venegas LiSchool of the Environment, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Andrew RogersSchool of the Environment, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Brendan A WintleMelbourne Biodiversity Institute, School of Agriculture, Food and Ecosystem Sciences, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Jennifer SilcockSchool of the Environment, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
John WoinarskiResearch Institute for the Environment and Livelihoods, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia.
Mark LintermansCentre for Applied Water Science, Institute for Applied Ecology, University of Canberra, Canberra, Australia.
Gary TaylorAustralian Centre for Evolutionary Biology and Biodiversity, and School of Biological Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Anna F V PintorAustralian Institute of Tropical Health and Medicine, James Cook University, Cairns, Queensland, Australia.
James E M WatsonSchool of the Environment, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4942-1984

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accounting for the cost of repairing the degradation of Earth's biosphere is critical to guide conservation and sustainable development decisions. Yet the costs of repairing nature through the recovery of a continental suite of threatened species across their range have never been calculated. We estimated the cost of in situ recovery of nationally listed terrestrial and freshwater threatened species (n = 1,657) across the megadiverse continent of Australia by combining the spatially explicit costs of all strategies required to address species-specific threats. Individual species recovery required up to 12 strategies (mean 2.3), predominantly habitat retention and restoration, and the management of fire and invasive species. The estimated costs of maximizing threatened species recovery across Australia varied from AU$0-$12,626 per ha, depending on the species, threats and context of each location. The total cost of implementing all strategies to recover threatened species in their in situ habitat across Australia summed to an estimated AU$583 billion per year, with management of invasive weeds making up 81% of the total cost. This figure, at 25% of Australia's GDP, does not represent a realistic biodiversity conservation budget, but needs to be accounted for when weighing up decisions that lead to further costly degradation of Australia's natural heritage.

Indexed as

Conservation of Natural ResourcesEndangered SpeciesAustraliaBiodiversityEcosystemIntroduced Species

Identifiers

PMID39715952

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.