Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39715943›Full record

ArticleUrolithiasis2024

Harnessing magnetism: evaluation of safety, tolerance and feasibility of magnetic kidney stone retrieval in vivo in porcine models.

Thomas Amiel, Shyam Srinivasan, Chiara Turrina, Florian Ebel, Michael Straub, Sebastian P Schwaminger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Urolithiasis, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Thomas AmielDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany. thomas.amiel@mri.tum.de.
Shyam SrinivasanChair of Bioseparation Engineering, School of Engineering and Design, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Boltzmannstr. 15, 85748, Garching, Germany.
Chiara TurrinaChair of Bioseparation Engineering, School of Engineering and Design, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Boltzmannstr. 15, 85748, Garching, Germany.
Florian EbelChair of Bioseparation Engineering, School of Engineering and Design, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Boltzmannstr. 15, 85748, Garching, Germany.
Michael StraubDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.
Sebastian P SchwamingerDivision of Medicinal Chemistry, Otto Loewi Research Center, Medical University of Graz, Neue Stiftingtalstr. 6, 8010, Graz, Austria. sebastian.schwaminger@medunigraz.at.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The primary objective of urolithiasis therapy is complete stone removal and highest stone-clearance rates possible to minimize recurrence. A novel approach that employs a magnetic suspension and a magnetic probe for the passive collection and removal of small residual fragments was developed. This study assessed the feasibility of this system in porcine models. Five female domestic pigs underwent retrograde intrarenal surgery under general anaesthesia to assess the new magnetic system. Pre-analysed human calculi were endoscopically inserted and comminuted using lithotripsy. The magnetic suspension was applied, and the magnetic-stone fragment complex was extracted. After nephrectomy, independent blinded pathologists evaluated all the kidneys. Safety and tolerance assessments revealed no adverse events (i.e. no complications on the Clavien-Dindo scale > 1) or complications associated with treatment. This study revealed superficial urothelial damage in all animals, characterized by desquamation and inflammation, caused primarily by the insertion of access sheaths and laser lithotripsy. Residual magnetic particles were observed in the renal pelvis but did not show signs of toxicity even though this study is limited to the acute treatment. No pathological indicators were observed in the hemogram and urinalysis. Overall, the treatment did not cause any significant pathological changes. Preclinical in vivo evaluation of magnetic extraction of small rest fragments in porcine kidneys presents a promising, atraumatic approach for fragments removal. It demonstrated safety, tolerance, and feasibility that warrants clinical investigation. This method has the potential to increase stone-clearance rates with shorter extraction times, offering a possibility for addressing the challenge of urolithiasis in clinical practice.

Indexed as

Feasibility StudiesKidney CalculiAnimalsDisease Models, AnimalFemaleHumansKidneyLithotripsyMagneticsSwineCalculiKidney stone removalLithotripsyMagnetic extractionMagnetic particlesPorcine model

Identifiers

PMID39715943
PMCPMC11666679

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.