Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39715935›Full record

ArticleCommunications psychology2024

A neurocognitive mechanism for increased cooperation during group formation.

Wojciech Zajkowski, Ryan P Badman, Masahiko Haruno, Rei Akaishi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications psychology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Wojciech Zajkowski *Social Value Decision-Making Collaboration Unit, RIKEN Centre for Brain Science BTCC TOYOTA Collaboration Center, Wako, Saitama, 351-0198, Japan. wojciech.zajkowski@nih.gov.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6078-1724
Ryan P Badman *Social Value Decision-Making Collaboration Unit, RIKEN Centre for Brain Science BTCC TOYOTA Collaboration Center, Wako, Saitama, 351-0198, Japan.
Masahiko HarunoCenter for Information and Neural Networks, National Institute of Information and Communications Technology, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
Rei AkaishiSocial Value Decision-Making Collaboration Unit, RIKEN Centre for Brain Science BTCC TOYOTA Collaboration Center, Wako, Saitama, 351-0198, Japan. akaishirei@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6369-4893

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

How do group size changes influence cooperation within groups? To examine this question, we performed a dynamic, network-based prisoner's dilemma experiment with fMRI. Across 83 human participants, we observed increased cooperation as group size increased. However, our computational modeling analysis of behavior and fMRI revealed that groups size itself did not increase cooperation. Rather, interaction between (1) participants' stable prosocial tendencies, and (2) dynamic reciprocal strategy weighed by memory confidence, underlies the group size-modulated increase in cooperation because the balance between them shifts towards the prosocial tendency with higher memory demands in larger groups. We found that memory confidence was encoded in fusiform gyrus and precuneus, whereas its integration with prosocial tendencies was reflected in the left DLPFC and dACC. Therefore, interaction between recall uncertainty during reciprocal interaction (i.e., forgetting) and one's individual prosocial preference is a core pillar of emergent cooperation in more naturalistic and dynamic group formation.

Identifiers

PMID39715935
PMCPMC11666775

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.