ArticleTranslational stroke research2025
The Impact of Postprocedural Anticoagulant Use in Patients Undergoing Woven EndoBridge: A Multicenter Propensity Score-Matched Study.
Article in Translational stroke research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
39 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Woven EndoBridge (WEB) device has become a prominent treatment for wide-neck bifurcation intracranial aneurysms since its FDA approval in 2018. However, the impact of anticoagulant therapy on its efficacy and patient outcomes remains underexplored. This study aims to evaluate the effects of postoperative anticoagulant use on aneurysm occlusion, retreatment rates, and functional outcomes following WEB device implantation. This retrospective multicenter study included 457 patients treated with the WEB device across 10 academic institutions in the United States between January 2012 and June 2024. Patients were categorized based on postoperative anticoagulant use: 91 patients (19.9%) received anticoagulants, while 366 patients (80.1%) did not. Propensity score matching (PSM) was employed to control for potential confounders, resulting in 316 matched patients (229 non-anticoagulant and 87 anticoagulant). After PSM, the anticoagulant group had lower rates of excellent functional outcomes (mRS 0-1: 73% vs. 85%, p = 0.026) and higher mortality rates (6.7% vs. 3.7%, p = 0.33), though the latter difference was not statistically significant. No significant differences in the last follow-up adequate occlusion were observed between the two groups (p = 0.7). However, patients in the anticoagulant group had lower major device compaction (> 50%) (4.9% vs. 12%, p = 0.12) and retreatment rates (4.6% vs. 12%, p = 0.045). Postoperative anticoagulant use is associated with poor functional outcomes and higher tendency for higher mortality rate. No significant differences in the last follow-up adequate occlusion rate were observed between the anticoagulant group and non-anticoagulant group. However, patients in the anticoagulant group had lower major compaction and retreatment rates. These findings suggest that the WEB mechanism of occlusion is more complex than what have been hypothesized and highlight the need for individualized management strategies to optimize outcomes in patients requiring anticoagulation post-WEB. Further studies are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39715904What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.