ArticleNPJ digital medicine2024
Adaptive spatiotemporal encoding network for cognitive assessment using resting state EEG.
Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development of a deep learning-based prediction model for postoperative delirium using intraoperative electroencephalogram in adults.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Personalized EEG-guided brain stimulation targeting in major depression via network controllability and multi-objective optimization.BMC psychiatry · 2025Article
- Effect of natural and synthetic noise data augmentation on physical action classification by brain-computer interface and deep learning.Frontiers in neuroinformatics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cognitive impairment, marked by neurodegenerative damage, leads to diminished cognitive function decline. Accurate cognitive assessment is crucial for early detection and progress evaluation, yet current methods in clinical practice lack objectivity, precision, and convenience. This study included 743 participants, including healthy individuals, mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and dementia patients, with collected resting-state EEG data and cognitive scale scores. An adaptive spatiotemporal encoding framework was developed based on resting-state EEG, achieving an MAE of 3.12% (95% CI: 2.9034, 3.3975) in testing (sensitivity: 0.97, 95% CI: 0.779,1; specificity: 0.97, 95% CI: 0.779,1). The model's effectiveness was also validated on the neurofeedback (sensitivity: 0.867, 95% CI: 0.621, 0.963; specificity: 1, 95% CI: 0.439, 1.0) and TMS datasets (sensitivity: 0.833, 95% CI: 0.608, 0.942), which effectively reflect the participants' cognitive changes. The model effectively extracted repetitive spatiotemporal patterns from resting-state EEG, aiding in cognitive disease diagnosis and assessment in various scenarios.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.