Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39715875›Full record

ArticleNature human behaviour2025

Brain network dynamics predict moments of surprise across contexts.

Ziwei Zhang, Monica D Rosenberg

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature human behaviour, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The Anterior Insula Processes a Time-Resolved Subjective Risk Prediction Error.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  7. The Neural Underpinnings of Aphantasia: A Case Study of Identical Twins.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  8. Predicting surprise across contexts.Nature human behaviour · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ziwei ZhangDepartment of Psychology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA. zz112@uchicago.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-5720-3552
Monica D RosenbergDepartment of Psychology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA. mdrosenberg@uchicago.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-6179-4025

Funding

National Science Foundation (NSF) BCS-2043740
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We experience surprise when reality conflicts with our expectations. When we encounter such expectation violations in psychological tasks and daily life, are we experiencing completely different forms of surprise? Or is surprise a fundamental psychological process with shared neural bases across contexts? To address this question, we identified a brain network model, the surprise edge-fluctuation-based predictive model (EFPM), whose regional interaction dynamics measured with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) predicted surprise in an adaptive learning task. The same model generalized to predict surprise as a separate group of individuals watched suspenseful basketball games and as a third group watched videos violating psychological expectations. The surprise EFPM also uniquely predicts surprise, capturing expectation violations better than models built from other brain networks, fMRI measures and behavioural metrics. These results suggest that shared neurocognitive processes underlie surprise across contexts and that distinct experiences can be translated into the common space of brain dynamics.

Indexed as

BrainEmotionsNerve NetAdultBrain MappingFemaleHumansLearningMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID39715875

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.