Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39715847›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

A finite source retrial queueing inventory system with stock dependent arrival and heterogeneous servers.

T Harikrishnan, K Jeganathan, Shweta Redkar, G Umamaheswari, Balachandra Pattanaik, K Loganathan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

T HarikrishnanDepartment of Mathematics, Guru Nanak College (Autonomous), Chennai, India.
K JeganathanRamanujan Institute for Advanced Study in Mathematics, University of Madras, Chennai, India.
Shweta RedkarDepartment of Data Science and Engineering, Manipal University Jaipur, Jaipur, 303007, Rajasthan, India.
G UmamaheswariDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, MLR Institute of Technology, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
Balachandra PattanaikCollege of Engineering and Technology, Wollega University, Nekemte, Ethiopia. balapk197@wollegauniversity.edu.et.
K LoganathanDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, Manipal University Jaipur, Jaipur, 303007, Rajasthan, India. loganathankaruppusamy304@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article discusses a finite-source stock-dependent stochastic inventory system with multiple servers and a retrial facility. The system can store a maximum of S items, and the lifetime of each item is exponentially distributed. The primary customer arrives at the waiting hall from the finite source and receives service from multi-servers. The rate at which customers arrive depends on the current stock level. If the waiting hall is full during the primary customer's arrival, he enters the finite orbit. Additionally, customers in the waiting hall may lose patience and enter the orbit. To replenish the stock, we follow the (s, Q) ordering policy. We calculate the joint probability distribution of the number of inventory items, busy servers, and number of customers in the waiting hall and orbit at a steady state. We conduct a comparative numerical analysis to determine the impact of heterogeneous and homogeneous service rates on various metrics, such as the average impatient customer rate, the fraction of successful retrials, and the average number of customers in the waiting hall and orbit.

Indexed as

Classical retrial policyImpatient customersMarkov chainMulti-server(s, Q) ordering policySteady-stateStock-dependent arrival

Identifiers

PMID39715847
PMCPMC11666808

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.