ReviewJournal of molecular evolution2025
Mutation Rate Variation and Other Challenges in 2-LTR Dating of Primate Endogenous Retrovirus Integrations.
Review in Journal of molecular evolution, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The time of integration of germline-targeting Long Terminal Repeat (LTR) retroposons, such as endogenous retroviruses (ERVs), can be estimated by assessing the nucleotide divergence between the LTR sequences flanking the viral genes. Due to the viral replication mechanism, both LTRs are identical at the moment of integration, when the provirus becomes part of the host genome. After that time, proviral sequences evolve within the host DNA. When the mutation rate is known, nucleotide divergence between the LTRs would then be a measure of time elapsed since integration. Though frequently used, the approach has been complicated by the choice of host mutation rate and, to a lesser extent, by the method selected to estimate nucleotide divergence. As a result, outcomes can be incompatible with, for instance, speciation events identified from the fossil record. The review will give an overview of research reporting LTR-retroposon dating, and a summary of important factors to consider, including the quality, assembly, and alignment of sequences, the mutation rate of foreign DNA in host genomes, and the choice of a distance estimation method. Primates will here be the focus of the analysis because their genomes, ERVs, and fossil record have been extensively studied. However, most of the factors discussed have a wide applicability in the vertebrate field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39715846What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.