Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39715834›Full record

ReviewInnere Medizin (Heidelberg, Germany)2025

[Efficient treatment of mild Crohn's disease and mild ulcerative colitis].

Gerhard Rogler

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
In one paragraph

Review in Innere Medizin (Heidelberg, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Gerhard RoglerKlinik für Gastroenterologie und Hepatologie, Universitätsspital Zürich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zürich, Schweiz. gerhard.rogler@usz.ch.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The cornerstone of treatment for mild ulcerative colitis is still the oral or topical (rectal) application of aminosalicylates (5-ASA). 5‑ASA preparations are often only administered orally in mild ulcerative colitis. Study data show that in ulcerative proctitis and left-sided colitis, rectal 5‑ASA preparations are even more effective than oral administration. In a next step, steroid-containing topical therapies should be used. Topical steroids such as budesonide are also primarily used in mild Crohn's disease. However, it is controversial whether treatment is necessary in symptom-free patients. There is still a lack of evidence to prove that more aggressive treatment (using immunosuppressants, biologics or small molecules) has a long-term benefit in these patients. Most guidelines are critical of the use of 5‑ASA in mild Crohn's disease. Nevertheless, there is some evidence for sufficiently high-dose treatment with 5‑ASA, although one must be aware of its limited effectiveness. However, there is clear evidence for the postoperative use of 5‑ASA in cases of mild recurrence.

Indexed as

Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalColitis, UlcerativeCrohn DiseaseMesalamineAdministration, OralAdministration, RectalBudesonideHumansAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalBudesonideMesalamine5‑Aminosalicylic acidAdministration, oralAdministration, topicalBudesonideInflammatory bowel disease

Identifiers

PMID39715834
PMCPMC11761793

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.