ArticleScientific reports2024
Diagnostic performance of Uromonitor and TERTpm ddPCR urine tests for the non-invasive detection of bladder cancer.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Performance of Urine Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization for Diagnosis of Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Comprehensive Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Pan-Cancer Targeted Sequencing Reveals Genomic Heterogeneity and Prognostic Subgroups in Urothelial Bladder Cancer.Cancers · 2026Article
- TERT promoter C228T and C250T mutation detection combined with cytology in the diagnosis of urothelial carcinomas: a real-world cohort study in a Chinese population.Cancer cell international · 2026Article
- Diagnostic Performance and Clinical Utility of the UromonitorDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Bladder Cancer Biomarkers: Recent Advances in Early Detection, Treatment Prediction, and Prognosis.Oncology research · 2026Review
- Assessment of T1 and T2 Relaxation-Time Changes in NMIBC Tissue After 5-ALA Photodynamic Therapy Using Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging.Biomedicines · 2025Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Uromonitor and urinary telomerase reverse transcriptase promoter mutation droplet digital PCR (uTERTpm ddPCR) are non-invasive tests designed to detect bladder cancer in urine. We aimed to compare the diagnostic performance of uTERTpm ddPCR, Uromonitor and urine cytology in detecting bladder cancer. Urine samples were collected prospectively from patients diagnosed with primary (n = 74) and recurrent bladder cancer (n = 20) or benign urological conditions (n = 48) prior to surgical resection. The samples were tested for bladder cancer via uTERTpm ddPCR, Uromonitor and urine cytology. The sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values were calculated for each test, including confidence intervals. The results were stratified by low-grade non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer, high-grade non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer and muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Compared with urine cytology (59.5%, p = 0.005) and Uromonitor (56.8%, p = 0.001), the uTERTpm ddPCR test had the highest sensitivity (79.7%) for the detection of primary bladder cancer. Specificity did not significantly differ. The uTERTpm ddPCR test exhibited superior diagnostic performance over urine cytology and Uromonitor, highlighting its potential for non-invasive primary bladder cancer diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.