Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39715825›Full record

ArticleCommunications biology2024

Fecal microbiota transplants facilitate post-antibiotic recovery of gut microbiota in cheetahs (Acinonyx jubatus).

Sally L Bornbusch, Adrienne Crosier, Lindsey Gentry, Kristina M Delaski, Michael Maslanka, Carly R Muletz-Wolz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sally L BornbuschCenter for Conservation Genomics, Smithsonian's National Zoo and Conservation Biology Institution, Washington, DC, 20008, USA. sally.bornbusch@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-9996-8369
Adrienne CrosierAnimal Care Sciences, Smithsonian's National Zoo and Conservation Biology Institution, Washington, DC, 20008, USA.
Lindsey GentryCenter for Conservation Genomics, Smithsonian's National Zoo and Conservation Biology Institution, Washington, DC, 20008, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7934-4652
Kristina M DelaskiDepartment of Conservation Medicine, Smithsonian's National Zoo and Conservation Biology Institution, Front Royal, VA, 22630, USA.
Michael MaslankaDepartment of Nutrition Science, Smithsonian's National Zoo and Conservation Biology Institution, Washington, DC, 20008, USA.
Carly R Muletz-WolzCenter for Conservation Genomics, Smithsonian's National Zoo and Conservation Biology Institution, Washington, DC, 20008, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5047-9601

Funding

National Science Foundation (NSF) NSF IOS-2131060
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Burgeoning study of host-associated microbiomes has accelerated the development of microbial therapies, including fecal microbiota transplants (FMTs). FMTs provide host-specific microbial supplementation, with applicability across host species. Studying FMTs can simultaneously provide comparative frameworks for understanding microbial therapies in diverse microbial systems and improve the health of managed wildlife. Ex-situ carnivores, including cheetahs (Acinonyx jubatus), often suffer from intractable gut infections similar to those treated with antibiotics and FMTs in humans, providing a valuable system for testing FMT efficacy. Using an experimental approach in 21 cheetahs, we tested whether autologous FMTs facilitated post-antibiotic recovery of gut microbiota. We used 16S rRNA sequencing and microbial source tracking to characterize antibiotic-induced microbial extirpations and signatures of FMT engraftment for single versus multiple FMTs. We found that antibiotics extirpated abundant bacteria and FMTs quickened post-antibiotic recovery via engraftment of bacteria that may facilitate protein digestion and butyrate production (Fusobacterium). Although multiple FMTs better sustained microbial recovery compared to a single FMT, one FMT improved recovery compared to antibiotics alone. This study elucidated the dynamics of microbiome modulation in a non-model system and improves foundations for reproducible, low-cost, low-dose, and minimally invasive FMT protocols, emphasizing the scientific and applied value of FMTs across species.

Indexed as

AcinonyxAnti-Bacterial AgentsFecal Microbiota TransplantationGastrointestinal MicrobiomeAnimalsFecesFemaleMaleRNA, Ribosomal, 16SAnti-Bacterial AgentsRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID39715825
PMCPMC11666765

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.