ArticleScientific reports2024
An enhanced classification system of various rice plant diseases based on multi-level handcrafted feature extraction technique.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Attention-driven YOLOv11n-DeiT model for enhanced detection of tomato leaf diseases.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Integrating Kolmogorov-Arnold networks and sparse attention for robust visual plant disease symptom identification across diverse agricultural crops.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- Interpretable multitask deep learning model for detecting and analyzing severity of rice bacterial leaf blight.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- A Novel Hybrid Technique for Detecting and Classifying Hyperspectral Images of Tomato Fungal Diseases Based on Deep Feature Extraction and Manhattan Distance.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Endophytic Bacterial Community Structure and Function Response of BLB Rice Leaves After Foliar Application of Cu-Ag Nanoparticles.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Rice leaf disease classification using a fusion vision approach.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The rice plant is one of the most significant crops in the world, and it suffers from various diseases. The traditional methods for rice disease detection are complex and time-consuming, mainly depending on the expert's experience. The explosive growth in image processing, computer vision, and deep learning techniques provides effective and innovative agriculture solutions for automatically detecting and classifying these diseases. Moreover, more information can be extracted from the input images due to different feature extraction techniques. This paper proposes a new system for detecting and classifying rice plant leaf diseases by fusing different features, including color texture with Local Binary Pattern (LBP) and color features with Color Correlogram (CC). The proposed system consists of five stages. First, input images acquire RGB images of rice plants. Second, image preprocessing applies data augmentation to solve imbalanced problems, and logarithmic transformation enhancement to handle illumination problems has been applied. Third, the features extraction stage is responsible for extracting color features using CC and color texture features using multi-level multi-channel local binary pattern (MCLBP). Fourth, the feature fusion stage provides complementary and discriminative information by concatenating the two types of features. Finally, the rice image classification stage has been applied using a one-against-all support vector machine (SVM). The proposed system has been evaluated on three benchmark datasets with six classes: Blast (BL), Bacterial Leaf Blight (BLB), Brown Spot (BS), Tungro (TU), Sheath Blight (SB), and Leaf Smut (LS) have been used. Rice Leaf Diseases First Dataset, Second Dataset, and Third Dataset achieved maximum accuracy of 99.53%, 99.4%, and 99.14%, respectively, with processing time from [Formula: see text]. Hence, the proposed system has achieved promising results compared to other state-of-the-art approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.