ArticleHypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension2025
Prognostic value of beat-to-beat blood pressure variability parameters in patients after mechanical thrombectomy.
Article in Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Brain and hypertension: from sympathetic outflow to brain-focused blood pressure management.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2026Review
- Impact of blood pressure levels and variability after successful revascularization on the prognosis in ICAS-LVOS patients.Frontiers in neurologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The relationship of beat-to-beat blood pressure variability (BPV) with prognosis after mechanical thrombectomy (MT) is unclear. Consecutive patients with acute ischemic stroke with large vessel occlusion treated with and without MT matched 1:1 by age, sex, and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale were included. Beat-to-beat BPV was calculated for both systolic (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) as standard deviation, coefficient of variation, successive variation (SV), and average real variability (ARV) at 24-72 h after MT. Additionally, hour-to-hour (first 24 h after MT) and day-by-day BPV (first 7 days after MT) were also measured. The outcome was modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at 3 months. Of 168 patients, 84 patients received MT and 84 did not. MT closely correlated with lower beat-to-beat BPV parameters. Beat-to-beat SBP-SV and SBP-ARV were significantly higher in patients with unfavorable outcome than in those with favorable outcome (median 3.40 vs 2.71; P = 0.016; median 2.81 vs 2.20, P = 0.003). After adjusting for confounders, higher beat-to-beat SBP-SV and SBP-ARV were independently associated with unfavorable outcome in patients with MT (all P < 0.05). However, no association was found between hour-to-hour and day-by-day BPV and outcome at 3 months (P > 0.05). The patients with MT had lower beat-to-beat BPV values in the acute phase, which indicated that MT has a positive effect on beat-to-beat BPV. Furthermore, beat-to-beat BPV, rather than hour-to-hour or day-by-day BPV, is an independent risk factor for unfavorable outcome in patients after MT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39715793What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.