Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39715721›Full record

ArticleJournal of forensic sciences2025

Dimensions and position of the eye for facial approximations in a South African cone beam computed tomography sample.

Soné Van der Walt, Anna C Oettlé

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of forensic sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Soné Van der WaltAnatomy and Histology Department, School of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University, Ga-Rankuwa, Gauteng, South Africa.
Anna C OettléAnatomy and Histology Department, School of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University, Ga-Rankuwa, Gauteng, South Africa.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate population and sex-specific normative values for the orbital and ocular dimensions, including the position and protrusion of the eye relative to the orbital rim, are vital for reliable facial approximations. In studies utilizing cadaveric tissue and computed tomography scans, the observed measurements may be influenced by desiccation, distortion or gravity, respectively. This study assessed the dimensions of the eye and orbit and established the position and protrusion of the eye relative to the orbital margin using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans to negate the effect of gravity in the supine position. Scans of 197 adult South Africans (45 Black females, 49 Black males, 55 White females, and 48 White males) were selected retrospectively from private and public hospitals in Pretoria, South Africa. Linear distances were calculated from three-dimensional landmarks placed on the orbital rim and ocular equator using the MeVisLab © v.3.0.2 software. White females presented with significantly larger orbital heights and axial lengths of the eyes compared to Black females, while the eyeballs of Black females protruded more from the superior and lateral orbital margins. Black females presented with significantly smaller dimensions than Black males. On the contrary, White males exhibited significantly larger protrusion values than White females. The results of this study corroborate with the literature that sex, population, and modality significantly influence the position of the eye in the orbit, which emphasizes the necessity of creating population- and sex-specific facial approximations guidelines for the placement of the eye in the orbit.

Indexed as

Cone-Beam Computed TomographyEyeFaceOrbitAdolescentAdultAgedBlack PeopleFemaleForensic AnthropologyHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesSouth Africaeyeball dimensionsfacial approximationforensic facial reconstructionocular positionocular protrusionorbital dimensions

Identifiers

PMID39715721
PMCPMC11874133

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.