ArticleKorean journal of ophthalmology : KJO2025
Clinical Outcomes of XEN45 Gel Stent Implantation (Ab Externo, Open Conjunctival Approach) versus Trabeculectomy: A Real-World Study.
Article in Korean journal of ophthalmology : KJO, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo compare the clinical outcomes of XEN45 gel stent implantation surgery (ab externo, open conjunctiva) with those of trabeculectomy.
methodsWe retrospectively reviewed electronic medical record of 57 patients (62 eyes) treated with XEN implantation surgery (ab externo, open conjunctival approach) between April 1, 2021, and July 31, 2023, by the same surgeon. Preoperative clinical data including intraocular pressure (IOP), the number of glaucoma medications, and visual acuity were collected from 1 day to 12 months postoperatively. These data were compared and analyzed with those of 67 patients (78 eyes) received trabeculectomy between February 1, 2017, and April 30, 2022, by the same surgeon. Statistical analyses were performed with p < 0.05 as significant.
resultsComplete surgical success rate was 33.9% and 57.7% of the XEN and trabeculectomy groups, respectively (p = 0.005). The qualified success rate was 79.0% and 93.6%, respectively (p = 0.011). Postoperatively, the XEN group used more glaucoma medications than the trabeculectomy group (1.21 ± 1.05 vs. 0.69 ± 0.90, p = 0.003 at postoperative month 12). After postoperative month 1, the XEN group had a higher IOP (15.77 ± 5.07 mmHg vs. 13.17 ± 3.81 mmHg; at postoperative month 12, p = 0.001) and lower corneal astigmatism than the trabeculectomy group (1.32 ± 0.79 diopters vs. 1.88 ± 1.45 diopters, p = 0.020 at postoperative month 6). There was no significant difference in preoperative and postoperative best-corrected visual acuity (logMAR) between the groups at any of the follow-up period (favorable visual acuity subgroup; logMAR < 0.7). Postoperative complications were 0 cases of XEN group and 13 cases of trabeculectomy group (0% vs. 16.7%, p = 0.001). Also, XEN surgery (24 minutes 40 seconds ± 6 minutes 26 seconds) had a shorter operation time than the trabeculectomy (40 minutes 18 seconds ± 8 minutes 27 seconds, p < 0.001).
conclusionsCompared to trabeculectomy, XEN surgery (ab externo, open conjunctiva) showed relatively lower effectiveness (surgical success rate, IOP reduction). However, it demonstrated advantages as a minimally invasive glaucoma surgery, including a surgical success rate approaching about 80%, stability in inducing corneal astigmatism, fewer postoperative complications, and shorter operation times.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.