Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39715687›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2025

Cortical Beta Power Reflects the Influence of Pavlovian Cues on Human Decision-Making.

Gianluca Finotti, Luigi A E Degni, Marco Badioli, Daniela Dalbagno, Francesca Starita, Lara Bardi, Yulong Huang, Junjie Wei, Angela Sirigu, Valeria Gazzola and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Reduced Pavlovian Value Updating Alters Decision-Making in Sign-Trackers.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Gianluca FinottiDepartment of Psychology, Center for studies and research in Cognitive Neuroscience, University of Bologna, Cesena 47521, Italy.
Luigi A E DegniDepartment of Psychology, Center for studies and research in Cognitive Neuroscience, University of Bologna, Cesena 47521, Italy luigi.degni@unibo.it.ORCID 0000-0001-8870-3517
Marco BadioliDepartment of Psychology, Center for studies and research in Cognitive Neuroscience, University of Bologna, Cesena 47521, Italy.
Daniela DalbagnoDepartment of Psychology, Center for studies and research in Cognitive Neuroscience, University of Bologna, Cesena 47521, Italy.
Francesca StaritaDepartment of Psychology, Center for studies and research in Cognitive Neuroscience, University of Bologna, Cesena 47521, Italy.
Lara BardiDepartment of Experimental Psychology, Ghent University, Gent 9000, Belgium.
Yulong HuangInstitute of Cognitive Sciences Marc Jeannerod CNRS, UMR 5229, France and IMind Center of Excellence for Autism, Le Vinatier Hospital, Bron 69675, France.ORCID 0000-0002-4155-9711
Junjie WeiNetherlands Institute for Neuroscience, KNAW, Amsterdam 1105BA, The Netherlands.
Angela SiriguInstitute of Cognitive Sciences Marc Jeannerod CNRS, UMR 5229, France and IMind Center of Excellence for Autism, Le Vinatier Hospital, Bron 69675, France.
Valeria GazzolaNetherlands Institute for Neuroscience, KNAW, Amsterdam 1105BA, The Netherlands.
Giuseppe di PellegrinoDepartment of Psychology, Center for studies and research in Cognitive Neuroscience, University of Bologna, Cesena 47521, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7080-4758
Sara GarofaloDepartment of Psychology, Center for studies and research in Cognitive Neuroscience, University of Bologna, Cesena 47521, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reward-predictive cues can affect decision-making by enhancing instrumental responses toward the same (specific transfer) or similar (general transfer) rewards. The main theories on cue-guided decision-making consider specific transfer as driven by the activation of previously learned instrumental actions induced by cues sharing the sensory-specific properties of the reward they are associated with. However, to date, such theoretical assumption has never been directly investigated at the neural level. We hypothesize that such reactivation occurs within the premotor system and could be mapped by lateralized beta (12-30 Hz) desynchronization, a widely used marker of action selection and decision-making policy. To test this hypothesis, 42 participants (22 females) performed a pavlovian-to-instrumental transfer paradigm, while electroencephalographic activity was recorded. We anticipated increased beta desynchronization during the transfer phase when cues promoting specific transfer were presented, compared with cues predicting general transfer and neutral cues. The evidence collected confirmed our hypothesis, thus providing the first neural evidence in favor of the theorized reactivation of instrumental actions and corroborating the presence of two dissociable neural pathways underpinning specific and general transfer.

Indexed as

Beta RhythmCerebral CortexConditioning, ClassicalCuesDecision MakingAdultElectroencephalographyFemaleHumansMaleRewardTransfer, PsychologyYoung Adultbeta desynchronizationcue-guided decision-makingelectroencephalographypavlovian-to-instrumental transferpremotor system

Identifiers

PMID39715687
PMCPMC11800743

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.