ArticleGenome research2025
Evaluation of strategies for evidence-driven genome annotation using long-read RNA-seq.
Article in Genome research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Validation of the International Weed Genomics Consortium genome annotation pipeline through reannotation of the model species Arabidopsis thaliana.The plant genome · 2026Article
- Genome Assemblies for Seven Families of Birds From the Global South.Molecular ecology resources · 2026Article
- TUSCO: benchmarking transcriptome reconstruction with endogenous single-isoform controls.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Long-read assembly reveals vast transcriptional complexity in the placenta associated with metabolic and endocrine function.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Improving isoform-level eQTL and integrative genetic analyses of breast cancer risk with long-read RNA transcript assemblies.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
While the production of a draft genome has become more accessible due to long-read sequencing, the annotation of these new genomes has not been developed at the same pace. Long-read RNA sequencing offers a promising solution for enhancing gene annotation. In this study, we explore how sequencing platforms, Oxford Nanopore R9.4.1 chemistry or Pacific Biosciences (PacBio) Sequel II CCS, and data processing methods influence evidence-driven genome annotation using long reads. Incorporating PacBio transcripts into our annotation pipeline significantly outperformed traditional methods, such as ab initio predictions and short-read-based annotations. We applied this strategy to a nonmodel species, the Florida manatee, and compared our results to existing short-read-based annotation. At the loci level, both annotations were highly concordant, with 90% agreement. However, at the transcript level, the agreement was only 35%. We identified 4906 novel loci, represented by 5707 isoforms, with 64% of these isoforms matching known sequences in other mammalian species. Overall, our findings underscore the importance of using high-quality curated transcript models in combination with ab initio methods for effective genome annotation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.